2006
DOI: 10.1207/s15327876mp1802_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deployment Risk and Resilience Inventory: A Collection of Measures for Studying Deployment-Related Experiences of Military Personnel and Veterans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

30
710
4
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 659 publications
(750 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
30
710
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Parent/guardian status was defined as having one or more children younger than 18 years of age in the household, and considering oneself a parent, step-parent, guardian, or primary care-giver for the child(ren). Combat exposure was assessed with four items from the Department of Defense Post-Deployment Health Assessment, 28 assessing service in a combat or conflict zone that included any of the following exposures: exposure to dead or wounded; discharging a weapon; or feeling Bin great danger of being hurt or killed.^MST was assessed using the seven-item sexual harassment subscale of the Deployment Risk and Resilience Inventory, 29 and was coded positively if a woman reported any of the following: repeated crude or offensive sexual remarks or rumors; coercive sexual activity as a result of rewards or special treatment, or as a result of threats of harm or retaliation; sexual assault; or rape.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parent/guardian status was defined as having one or more children younger than 18 years of age in the household, and considering oneself a parent, step-parent, guardian, or primary care-giver for the child(ren). Combat exposure was assessed with four items from the Department of Defense Post-Deployment Health Assessment, 28 assessing service in a combat or conflict zone that included any of the following exposures: exposure to dead or wounded; discharging a weapon; or feeling Bin great danger of being hurt or killed.^MST was assessed using the seven-item sexual harassment subscale of the Deployment Risk and Resilience Inventory, 29 and was coded positively if a woman reported any of the following: repeated crude or offensive sexual remarks or rumors; coercive sexual activity as a result of rewards or special treatment, or as a result of threats of harm or retaliation; sexual assault; or rape.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social support-The DRRI-Postdeployment Social Support scale (PDSS) from the Deployment Risk and Resilience Inventory (King, King, Vogt, Knight, & Samper 2006) was used to assess perceived availability of social support. The PDSS was administered four months after the initial assessment.…”
Section: Measures Of Psychological Resources and Mediating Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The items directly related to exposure are to some extent similar to those in the widely used combat exposure scale (Keane et al, 1989) measuring only the dimension ‘combat experiences’. However, the distinction in DI between perceived exposure to combat and witnessing the consequences of war is more in line with another well-known self-reported combat exposure scale namely the Deployment Risk and Resilience Inventory (DRRI-2), with a distinction between combat experiences (perceived threat, perceived exposure) and post-battle experiences (King, King, Knight, & Samper, 2006; Vogt et al, 2013). Perceived DI was expressed as a total sum score, and thus based on an assumption of unidimensionality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Second, the construction and selection of the original perceived DI items was performed by military psychologists and other researchers, and there is no record on theoretical or empirical justification on item generation or inclusion. However, comparison with other scales for assessing combat exposure and other adverse events during deployment (King, King, Vogt, et al, 2006) suggests a substantial semantic overlap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation