Describing human decisions in agent-based models – ODD + D, an extension of the ODD protocol

Müller, Birgit; Bohn, Friedrich J.; Dreíler, Gunnar; Groeneveld, Jürgen; Klassert, Christian; Martin, Romina; Schlüter, Maja; Schulze, Jule; Weise, Hanna; Schwarz, Nina

doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.06.003

Cited by 409 publications

(251 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

243

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…B 283: 20152431 electronic supplementary material, table S1. A detailed model description using the ODDþD protocol [40] can be found in electronic supplementary material, table S2.…”

Section: ð2:4þmentioning

confidence: 99%

Robustness of norm-driven cooperation in the commons

2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable use of common-pool resources such as fish, water or forests depends on the cooperation of resource users that restrain their individual extraction to socially optimal levels. Empirical evidence has shown that under certain social and biophysical conditions, self-organized cooperation in the commons can evolve. Global change, however, may drastically alter these conditions. We assess the robustness of cooperation to environmental variability in a stylized model of a community that harvests a shared resource. Community members follow a norm of socially optimal resource extraction, which is enforced through social sanctioning. Our results indicate that both resource abundance and a small increase in resource variability can lead to collapse of cooperation observed in the no-variability case, while either scarcity or large variability have the potential to stabilize it. The combined effects of changes in amount and variability can reinforce or counteract each other depending on their size and the initial level of cooperation in the community. If two socially separate groups are ecologically connected through resource leakage, cooperation in one can destabilize the other. These findings provide insights into possible effects of global change and spatial connectivity, indicating that there is no simple answer as to their effects on cooperation and sustainable resource use.

show abstract

“…B 283: 20152431 electronic supplementary material, table S1. A detailed model description using the ODDþD protocol [40] can be found in electronic supplementary material, table S2.…”

Section: ð2:4þmentioning

confidence: 99%

Robustness of norm-driven cooperation in the commons

2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2 3 We recommend that researchers build on current examples of good model descriptions, not only to 4 describe their models transparently, but also to strive for common standards in describing ABMs, in 5 order to contribute to comparability, model assessment and replication, and theory development. 6 However, many open questions and challenges also remain, which need to be addressed to improve 7 model descriptions in the future. 8…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Standardised and transparent model descriptions for agent-based models: Current status and prospects

Müller

Balbi

Buchmann

et al. 2014

Environmental Modelling & Software

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Weise, H. (2014). Standardised and transparent model descriptions for agent-based models: Current status and prospects. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING AND SOFTWARE, 55, 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.•Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research.•You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact librarypure@kcl.ac.uk providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

show abstract

“…Suggestions have been made for agent-based approaches such as the overview, design concepts, detail (ODD) protocol (Müller et al 2013). I do not recommend using a particular guideline, but in my view, authors using an integrated modeling approach with an emphasis on scientific results should answer the question, How explicit should we consider the participatory aspect in our modeling paper?, given that the scientific process and its results are complex in themselves.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A functional-dynamic reflection on participatory processes in modeling projects

Seidl

2015

Ambio

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The participation of nonscientists in modeling projects/studies is increasingly employed to fulfill different functions. However, it is not well investigated if and how explicitly these functions and the dynamics of a participatory process are reflected by modeling projects in particular. In this review study, I explore participatory modeling projects from a functional-dynamic process perspective. The main differences among projects relate to the functions of participation-most often, more than one per project can be identified, along with the degree of explicit reflection (i.e., awareness and anticipation) on the dynamic process perspective. Moreover, two main approaches are revealed: participatory modeling covering diverse approaches and companion modeling. It becomes apparent that the degree of reflection on the participatory process itself is not always explicit and perfectly visible in the descriptions of the modeling projects. Thus, the use of common protocols or templates is discussed to facilitate project planning, as well as the publication of project results. A generic template may help, not in providing details of a project or model development, but in explicitly reflecting on the participatory process. It can serve to systematize the particular project's approach to stakeholder collaboration, and thus quality management.

show abstract

Describing human decisions in agent-based models – ODD + D, an extension of the ODD protocol

Cited by 409 publications

References 54 publications

Robustness of norm-driven cooperation in the commons

Robustness of norm-driven cooperation in the commons

Standardised and transparent model descriptions for agent-based models: Current status and prospects

A functional-dynamic reflection on participatory processes in modeling projects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About