Desempenho de sujeitos com comprometimento cognitivo leve em tarefas de compressão textual

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The mild cognitive impairment has been studied in language tasks with high cognitive demand. Analyses based on comprehension of texts that require carrying out inferences are recent. This study aimed to verify the performance of subjects with mild cognitive impairment in textual comprehension tasks that require carrying out inferences and compares it to the performance of normal subjects. METHODS: We evaluated 60 subjects aged between 60 and 89 years, of both sexes. The subjects were divided into two groups, 30 normal subjects and 30 subjects with mild cognitive impairment, matched for education (up to 4 years, 4-8 years and over 9 years). The instrument used was the Portuguese version of the test of "Managing the implied" that uses five distinct types of inferences (explicit, logical, pragmatic, distracting and other). We evaluated the inferential reasoning to provide the answer 60 questions about reading 20 small texts and compared the performance between groups. RESULTS: The mild cognitive impairment group showed significantly lower performance in the type inferences pragmatic than the group of normal subjects. For other types of inferences there was statistical difference. CONCLUSION: The group with mild cognitive impairment showed worse performance in carrying out pragmatic type inferences. The similarity in performance between the groups to perform the other inferences demonstrates the preservation of linguistic-cognitive aspects in mild cognitive impairment. The results confirm the possibility of differentiating subjects with mild cognitive impairment and normal through language tests.