Workflow Management Systems and Interoperability 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-58908-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Implementation of a Distributed Workflow Management System: METUFlow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this distributed variant of the ADEPT system, we allow WF designers to subdivide a WF schema into several partitions which are then controlled "piecewise" by different WF servers in order to obtain favorable communication behavior. Note that similar approaches have been discussed in literature (Alonso, 1995;Casati, 1996;Cichocki, 2000;Dogac, 1997;Gronemann, 1999;Guth, 1998;Kochut, 2003;Muth, 1998;Schuster, 1999;Sheth, 1997;Weske, 1999).…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this distributed variant of the ADEPT system, we allow WF designers to subdivide a WF schema into several partitions which are then controlled "piecewise" by different WF servers in order to obtain favorable communication behavior. Note that similar approaches have been discussed in literature (Alonso, 1995;Casati, 1996;Cichocki, 2000;Dogac, 1997;Gronemann, 1999;Guth, 1998;Kochut, 2003;Muth, 1998;Schuster, 1999;Sheth, 1997;Weske, 1999).…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Furthermore, completely distributed WfMS, like Exotica/FMQM (Alonso, 1995) and INCAs (Barbará, 1996}, use the machines of the actors as WF servers. Finally, there are approaches for distributed WF management, which do not have a special strategy for distributing the activities to the WF servers; e.g., EVE (Geppert, 1998), METUFlow (Dogac, 1997), MOKASSIN (Gronemann, 1999), WASA 2 (Weske, 1998;Weske, 1999), and the Petri-net based approach presented in (Guth, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although executing processes in a peer-to-peer way without involving a centralized component, OSIRIS provides transactional guarantees, following the model of transactional processes [30]. METUFLOW [10] and TransCoop [1] also provide transactional semantics for workflows in a distributed environment.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of these challenges, a number of groups have started new projects (e.g., Infopipes [25], ObjectGlobe [6], ISEE [20], METUFLOW [10] and MARCAs [12], or eFlow [7]) breaking out of conventional technology. At ETH Zurich, the hyperdatabase vision [27,28] was established several years ago with the objective to identify a new middleware infrastructure based on well-understood concepts evolving from database technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In der Forschung und Entwicklung im Bereich WorkflowManagement gibt es derzeit eine Reihe von Schwerpunkten, von denen Flexibilisierung und dynamische Veränderungen [10,20,29,30,7] sowie objektorientierte Ansätze [26,5] und die OMG-Aktivitäten bei der Definition einer WorkflowFacility [18] für unsere Arbeiten besonders relevant sind.…”
Section: Verwandte Arbeitenunclassified