2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00347-016-0224-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design des ORCA-Moduls der OCEAN-Studie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…OCTs were evaluated using the Orca module , which assesses certain morphological OCT parameters listed in Table 2 [ 26 ]. Seventy-seven of the 164 eyes with BCVA of ≥ 1.3 logMAR were included in the OCT evaluation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…OCTs were evaluated using the Orca module , which assesses certain morphological OCT parameters listed in Table 2 [ 26 ]. Seventy-seven of the 164 eyes with BCVA of ≥ 1.3 logMAR were included in the OCT evaluation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also recorded the intravitreally administered medication, age, and gender. Furthermore, morphological OCT features were evaluated applying the OCT criteria from the Orca module of the Ocean study [ 26 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although just “OCT” was written in the study protocol, the use of spectral domain (SD-OCT) had mostly replaced time domain machines (TD-OCT) during the period of the study [ 28 ]. Further evaluations must be awaited, which describe a subsequent second diagnosis of the images by several reading centres [ 29 , 30 ]. Hopefully, the results will shed some light on why patients were so rarely treated despite ophthalmologist visits and OCT examinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation process of SD-OCT scans for the ORCA study have been previously described. 19 Further, adequacy of treatment indication by the clinician was assessed and possible reasons for suspected undertreatment or overtreatment were evaluated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%