2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2914260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design, Modeling and Analysis of Perforated RF MEMS Capacitive Shunt Switch

Abstract: This paper illustrates the design, modeling, and analysis of bridge type structure based capacitive RF MEMS switch with different beam thickness and materials. We have used Ashby's approach to select the best materials in each and every level which helped to improve the overall performance of the switch in terms of mechanical, electrical, and RF properties. Silicon Nitride thin film (ε r = 7.8) is used as a dielectric material. The beam structure stiffness is analyzed with different materials, such as gold, ti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MEMS are multiphysics devices and generally require the optimization of multiple output responses for a given set of design parameters and microfabrication process constraints. The optimization of MEMS is traditionally carried out by varying one factor at a time and analyzing its effect on an output response either by developing analytical models, FEM models, or topology optimization [14][15][16][17][18][19]. These methods are efficient for MEMS devices with simple geometric configuration but for MEMS with relatively complex geometry and with the requirement of multiphysics design space exploration and multiple output responses to be optimized simultaneously, these methods become inefficient due to high computational costs and modelling complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEMS are multiphysics devices and generally require the optimization of multiple output responses for a given set of design parameters and microfabrication process constraints. The optimization of MEMS is traditionally carried out by varying one factor at a time and analyzing its effect on an output response either by developing analytical models, FEM models, or topology optimization [14][15][16][17][18][19]. These methods are efficient for MEMS devices with simple geometric configuration but for MEMS with relatively complex geometry and with the requirement of multiphysics design space exploration and multiple output responses to be optimized simultaneously, these methods become inefficient due to high computational costs and modelling complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The voltage is applied on the two metal plates it will slightly under the step-down voltage, so the movable beam having maximum deflection. [24].…”
Section: Stress Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By reducing the number of connectors or selecting low insertion loss devices we can achieve low insertion loss. As power is expensive at greater frequencies, electromechanical switches provide the lowest possible loss along the transmission line [18][19][20]. The S-parameters of return, insertion, and isolations are shown in Figs.…”
Section: Rf-performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%