2019 34rd Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/yac.2019.8787720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of A Double-blockchain Structured Carbon Emission Trading Scheme with Reputation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[9] USA (2015) X S. Saraji [20] USA (2021) X X X X X X J. King [22] UK (2018) X X X X X K. Skene [21] USA (2017) x X M. Swan [23] USA (2015) X M. Crosby [24] USA (2016) X G. Greenspan [3] USA (2015) X S. Nakamoto [25] USA (2008) X X. Liang [26] China (2019) X X X X L. Pigeolet [27] BRZ (2019) X X X X F. Casino [28] USA (2019) X X K. Khaqqi [29] SING (2018) X X X X S. Zhao [30] UK (2019) X O. Sabbaghi [11] USA (2013) X L. Eyraud [13] -(2013) X B. Zhang [8] -(2013) X X X PWC [12] USA (2021) X X SPG Global [17] USA (2021) X X Argus Media [19] -(2021) X X X X McKinsey [18] USA (2021) X X X X X. Meegan [31] USA (2010…”
Section: Problem Statement and Critical Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[9] USA (2015) X S. Saraji [20] USA (2021) X X X X X X J. King [22] UK (2018) X X X X X K. Skene [21] USA (2017) x X M. Swan [23] USA (2015) X M. Crosby [24] USA (2016) X G. Greenspan [3] USA (2015) X S. Nakamoto [25] USA (2008) X X. Liang [26] China (2019) X X X X L. Pigeolet [27] BRZ (2019) X X X X F. Casino [28] USA (2019) X X K. Khaqqi [29] SING (2018) X X X X S. Zhao [30] UK (2019) X O. Sabbaghi [11] USA (2013) X L. Eyraud [13] -(2013) X B. Zhang [8] -(2013) X X X PWC [12] USA (2021) X X SPG Global [17] USA (2021) X X Argus Media [19] -(2021) X X X X McKinsey [18] USA (2021) X X X X X. Meegan [31] USA (2010…”
Section: Problem Statement and Critical Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By operating on the blockchain, data is cryptographically secured, meaning that changes to one block of data will need the approval of others, thereby minimising security risks associated with the ecosystem [26]. Users are also protected through the trust-less public/private key mechanism, which will minimise fraudulent use of personal data and funds by unauthorised parties.…”
Section: Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They claim that the purchase of carbon allowances constitutes a part of the energy costs, and an efficient decentralized trading platform is therefore required to enable prosumers to trade energy and carbon allowances together. To further enhance the carbon emissions trading system, a blockchain-based reputation system is proposed [43,44], where participants can promote their reputation by increasing investments in emission reduction or others indicating their emission reduction efforts. Khaqqi et al [43] expect that the participants will have stronger incentives to set higher permit prices in order to compensate for their costly emission reduction strategy such that the carbon price will increase without extra supply shortage or the establishment of a price floor.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above characteristics have the potential to be widely used in carbon quota trading and auditing [2] . At present, most of the block chain-enabled carbon emissions work is devoted to carbon trading [3,4,5] or carbon emission audit [6,7,8,9] alone; Audit of privacy requires unencrypted data 6 , which makes the privacy of the entire public system seriously threatened when a single device is breached. In summary, data privacy and system security are two important issues that must be addressed in carbon emissions trading and auditing activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%