Volume 7: 29th Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Parts a and B 2005
DOI: 10.1115/detc2005-85413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Parallel Kinematic XY Flexure Mechanisms

Abstract: This paper presents parallel kinematic XY mechanism designs that are based on a systematic constraint pattern. The constraint pattern, realized by means of double parallelogram flexure modules, is such that it allows large ranges of motion without over-constraining the mechanism or generating significant error motions. Nonlinear force-displacement characteristics of the double parallelogram flexure are used in analytically predicting the performance measures of the proposed XY mechanisms. Comparisons between c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…minimum incremental motion). These good characteristics [9][10] include: 1) large range of motion along the desired direction (also large-range motion along the intending degree of freedom), 2) inherently well-constrained parasitic error motion (also the minimal undesired motion along the degree of constraint), 3) minimal cross-axis coupling motion 1 (also kinematostatic decoupling/outputdecoupling that is the minimal undesired motion along nonintending degree of freedom), 4) maximal actuator isolation (also input-decoupling that is the minimal transverse motion of the actuator), 5) minimal lost motion (also the minimal displacement difference between the actuator and the motion stage), 6) maximal drive stiffness (also the maximal overall stiffness between the point of actuation and the motion stage), 7) low thermal and manufacturing sensitivities, 8) compactness of the configuration, 9) minimal number of geometrical parameters (for example using identical modules), 10) low cost, and 11) desired dynamic performance (including high natural frequency and no uncontrollable mass).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…minimum incremental motion). These good characteristics [9][10] include: 1) large range of motion along the desired direction (also large-range motion along the intending degree of freedom), 2) inherently well-constrained parasitic error motion (also the minimal undesired motion along the degree of constraint), 3) minimal cross-axis coupling motion 1 (also kinematostatic decoupling/outputdecoupling that is the minimal undesired motion along nonintending degree of freedom), 4) maximal actuator isolation (also input-decoupling that is the minimal transverse motion of the actuator), 5) minimal lost motion (also the minimal displacement difference between the actuator and the motion stage), 6) maximal drive stiffness (also the maximal overall stiffness between the point of actuation and the motion stage), 7) low thermal and manufacturing sensitivities, 8) compactness of the configuration, 9) minimal number of geometrical parameters (for example using identical modules), 10) low cost, and 11) desired dynamic performance (including high natural frequency and no uncontrollable mass).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A partial SC based design was discussed in [9] for a 2-PP XY CPM, which can only minimise the parasitic rotational yaw well if only one actuation force is applied. The SC refers to a point through which an actuation force along the primary motion direction is applied on the motion stage of a planarmotion/spatial-motion compliant module to produce the primary translation with minimised parasitic rotation.…”
Section: Sc Overlapping Based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iv) Once the building blocks are generated, a library of design topologies can be generated by using the building block as an implementation of the constraints (following a constraint-based synthesis approach [29]) for satisfying the necessary kinematics. In a nutshell, using the performance-tuned building block allows to meet a strength, or modal performance criterion, while the constraint-based arrangement allows for satisfying the required kinematics.…”
Section: Primitivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is challenging to design an XY stage with a large workspace and a compact physical dimension, simultaneously. Using the modified area ratio (Xu, 2012) whose denominators the actuators' dimensions should be added into, the area ratios of the stages proposed in Awtar (2004), Xu (2012) and Yu et al (2015) are only about 0.067, 0.069 and 0.026 % respectively; (b) the out-of-plane payload capacity is weak. When applied large out-of-plane payload, the load-stiffening phenomenon (Awtar et al, 2007) emerges in PPXYSs, which would induce nonlinearity and cause the loss of travel range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of millimeter-scale PPXYSs were proposed by researchers. Awtar (2004), Trease et al (2004), Tang et al (2006), Xu (2012) and Yu et al (2015) have designed and developed millimeter even centimeter scale PPXYSs. However, there are two main defects of these PPXYSs: (a) the structures of the stages are relatively loose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%