2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2011.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of robust layout for Dynamic Plant Layout Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Part movement cost, and batch size are set to ten and one, respectively. As mentioned, MADHUSUDANAN-PILLAI, et al [6]. proposed an SA algorithm to solve their robust layout design model, which is termed MP-SA hereafter.…”
Section: Benchmark Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Part movement cost, and batch size are set to ten and one, respectively. As mentioned, MADHUSUDANAN-PILLAI, et al [6]. proposed an SA algorithm to solve their robust layout design model, which is termed MP-SA hereafter.…”
Section: Benchmark Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MADHUSUDANAN-PILLAI, et al [6], proposed a SA algorithm to solve their robust layout design model. SOOLAKI, et al [7], solved a cell design problem in an uncertain environment of manufacturing systems by developing a robust optimization model.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otros escenarios propuestos a futuro son la elaboración de directrices relativas al medio ambiente (Al-Mubarak, 2003), estudios de esquemas de asignación de más de un elemento a la vez en una celda, considerando múltiples objetivos (Madhusudanan Pillai, 2011).…”
Section: Perspectivas Y Tendencias a Futurounclassified
“…To compare the performance of the proposed model with the previous approaches, which deal with the static environment, facility relocating cost is set to zero. Madhusudanan-Pillai et al (2011) proposed a SA algorithm to solve their robust layout design model, which is termed MP-SA hereafter. Another heuristic method was also developed by Irappa and Madhusudanan (2008) to solve their model, which is denoted by I-M hereafter.…”
Section: Benchmark Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%