Design Strategies and Processes through the Concept of Resilience

최, 혜영; 서, 영애

doi:10.9715/kila.2018.46.5.044

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Note: * the categories presented in Table 2 were constructed with reference to Choi and Seo's paper ref. [18].…”

Section: Guidelines For Resilience Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study on the Redevelopment of the Hangang River Waterfront from an Urban Resilience Perspective

Jun,

Song

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cities worldwide are developing strategies to cope with heat waves, extreme colds, floods, wildfires, hurricanes, earthquakes, droughts, pandemics, and other disasters caused by climate change. To this end, a resilience theory is being expanded and applied as a methodology to secure social and spatial systems that respond to climate change while providing ecological habitats and spaces for more diverse human activities. This study evaluated resilient redevelopment strategies for the Hangang River in Seoul by drawing on practices grounded in resilience theory. This study analyzed the nine proposals from the Resilience by Design Challenge, which aimed to gather response strategies for climate change in the San Francisco Bay Area in 2017 to identify practical physical design and social system strategies. Each team’s strategy for implementing urban resilience focused on six categories: governance systems, financial planning, public engagement, accessibility, ecology, and diversity. The guidelines to consider during the redevelopment of the Hangang River in Seoul were formulated by applying these criteria to the review of the river. This process has also yielded the following implications and characteristics for resilient design. First, ensuring the resilience of a city necessitates prioritizing the resolution of regional imbalances. Second, the social and ecological resilience of cities is intricately intertwined. Moreover, comprehending the dynamics between the two can guide effective, resilient design. Third, resilient design’s spatial and temporal scales are extensive and varied, highlighting the importance of understanding the relationships among categories and subcategories at different hierarchies. Finally, the value of urban waterfront space, traditionally associated with positive cultural and economic contributions to cities, must be reevaluated more profoundly and meaningfully in light of climate change.

show abstract

“…Note: * the categories presented in Table 2 were constructed with reference to Choi and Seo's paper ref. [18].…”

Section: Guidelines For Resilience Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study on the Redevelopment of the Hangang River Waterfront from an Urban Resilience Perspective

Jun,

Song

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The results of the Yongsan Park project mentioned above can be compared to those of the Rebuild by Design Competition held in 2014 and the Resilient by Design/Bay Area Challenge held in 2018. Choi and Seo [22] analyzed six teams' proposals for the Rebuild by Design Competition [62][63][64][65][66][67] and nine final submissions for the Resilient by Design/Bay Area Challenge [21] with the same urban resilience framework used for this paper. Even though the two competitions had different characteristics (i.e., Rebuild by Design mainly focused on how urban systems that are impacted and destroyed by disasters can be reconstructed, whereas Resilient by Design tried to find a way to build more resilient urban areas before disasters hit), there are similarities in their proposals to create urban resilience.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Choi and Seo analyzed the resilience strategies of urban projects by deriving the Urban Resilience Framework [22] through the studies of Foster [23], the Resilience Alliance [24], Sharifi and Yamagata [25], and Meerow et al [26], that distinguished the objects for evaluating urban resilience based on Arup's City Resilience Framework [27]. The Urban Resilience Framework, an analysis tool established by summarizing previous works, consists of six parts: urban infrastructure, social dynamics, economic dynamics, health and well-being, governance networks, and planning and institutions, which are divided again into subcategories.…”

Section: Study Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Process of Creating Yongsan Park from the Urban Resilience Perspective

Choi

Seo

2019

Sustainability

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The concept of resilience implies uncertainty and the ability to adapt to unexpected changes. Projects in cities that require long periods of time and extensive budgets, which include large parks, need resilience to flexibly cope with political, economic, social, and physical changes. The concept of resilience emerged from the design of large parks in the early 2000s and has continued in more recent urban design competitions, but there is still a lack of research on specific planning strategies in the literature. This paper aims to interpret the process of creating a large park and to explore the strategies needed for a resilient process by examining the first national urban park being planned in Seoul, Korea as an example. After discussions began in 1990 and the General Basic Plan was established in 2011, the winning design was announced through an international design competition in 2012. Although the park master plan was considered complete as of 2018, its progress seems unclear because of various changes in the surrounding urban planning and political and economic conditions. This study intends to examine the processes that have already been executed and to assist in setting the future direction of the project. Through the framework derived from prior research on the concept of resilience, this project’s process is examined and analyzed in six main categories: park infrastructure, social dynamics, economic dynamics, health and well-being, governance networks, and planning and institutions. The results show that the categories park infrastructure, health and well-being, and planning and institutions are consistent with the resilience planning strategy to some degree, but social dynamics, economic dynamics, and governance networks are unsatisfactory. From a resilience perspective, a holistic approach to designing the process is most important in planning a large park, beginning from the conceptual stage through to the long-term implementation phase. An integrative process should aim to incorporate specialized knowledge and experiences from a variety of fields, not to resolve single aspects in a piecemeal fashion. This study aims to provide a practical link between large-scale park projects and the concept of resilience for the future.

show abstract

“…The phasing of the winning proposal for Yongsan park epitomized the resilience of an urban park [59], although the specific construction process is still uncertain due to the complicated Korean political circumstances and environmental contamination of the military site (Figure 7). The resilient design of urban parks is currently treated as a significant theoretical perspective in Korean landscape architecture [60]. Third, digital modeling, fabrication, and construction technologies were used as active design tools for the various landforms performing ecological functions.…”

Section: Around 2010s: Resilient Ecologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecological Design Strategies and Theory for Urban Parks in Seoul, 1990s–Present

Lee

2021

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study explores the characteristics of and changes in Korean landscape architects’ attitudes toward ecological design strategies and theories over the last three decades. Methodologically, this study includes a literature review and incorporates data from case studies and site visits. It discusses Seoul-specific contexts regarding environmental conditions, urban morphology, administrative agency, and design theory and practice. It redefines ecological parks, expanding their scope using physical and non-physical ecological processes. Considering this redefinition, this study categorizes the five main attitudes of contemporary Korean landscape architects towards ecological design: providing wildlife habitat, constructing aesthetic experiences, the phasing strategy, developing environmental learning programs, and designers’ metaphoric expression. Through these attitudes, this study chronologically explores gradual and constant changes in design strategies and the discourse on ecological design. Specifically, in the 1990s, landscape architects emphasized the representation of ecosystems by constructing wildlife habitats. In the early 2000s, ecological parks were artistically designed as urban parks by reusing post-industrial landscapes. Around the 2010s, landscape architects developed resilient and adaptive design strategies to flexibly respond to uncertain changes in natural and urban ecological circumstances. Since the 2010s, landscape architects have continually expanded the scope of ecology to cover physical, non-physical, urban, and social infrastructures, including public transportation, as well as political, social, and cultural structures and virtual and augmented landscapes. This study can contribute to the field literature while adding a valuable overview of the understudied Korean context.

show abstract

Design Strategies and Processes through the Concept of Resilience

Cited by 6 publications

References 15 publications

Study on the Redevelopment of the Hangang River Waterfront from an Urban Resilience Perspective

Study on the Redevelopment of the Hangang River Waterfront from an Urban Resilience Perspective

The Process of Creating Yongsan Park from the Urban Resilience Perspective

Ecological Design Strategies and Theory for Urban Parks in Seoul, 1990s–Present

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About