2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cps.2016.0025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing CPS/IoT applications for smart buildings and cities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shih et al [45] review the middleware, computation model, data quality and run-time environments necessary for smart building and smart city implementations, while Salim et al [46] survey approaches for engaging human interaction with urban computing technologies. A survey of mobile crowd sensing approaches [13] that is closely aligned to this paper, presents a taxonomy based on the data collection steps, processing architecture and resulting applications.…”
Section: Figure 1 Cyber-physical--social Systems (Cpss) (Adapted Fromentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shih et al [45] review the middleware, computation model, data quality and run-time environments necessary for smart building and smart city implementations, while Salim et al [46] survey approaches for engaging human interaction with urban computing technologies. A survey of mobile crowd sensing approaches [13] that is closely aligned to this paper, presents a taxonomy based on the data collection steps, processing architecture and resulting applications.…”
Section: Figure 1 Cyber-physical--social Systems (Cpss) (Adapted Fromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors [4] state that while there are similarities between CPS and IoT, i.e., device cooperation to reach defined goals, IoT has a horizontal view comprised of hardware components interacting with each other, whereas CPS takes a vertical approach encompassing networked hardware, computational processes and control mechanisms. Other studies [45], while acknowledging the difference in system architectures of CPS and IoT, refer to them interchangeably. An increased level of abstraction in IoT is attributed to a large number of undefined factors, which are known only in terms of contribution to the system operation [44].…”
Section: Figure 2 Evolution Of Cpssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from extending the network lifetime and achieving effective communications for monitoring industrial conditions, energy-efficient deployment and sleep scheduling in GIWSNs by the proposed method can decrease the frequency of replacing failed sensors and further decrease environmental pollution due to discarded sensors and facilities, achieving the purpose of sustainability. In [5] To enhance safety in buildings and city and to reduce energy consumption IOT/CPS systems should be well designed. the challenging issues are how to federate computing services in different computation models.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Device integration and management systems [4]- [6] abstract over low-level protocols and are essential to allow both novice and advanced users to benefit from the increasing availability of IoT hardware. Several IoT solutions have been used to implement smart applications for a range of domains including home automation [7], agriculture [8], aquarium management [9], smart campuses [10], entertainment [11], art [12], and more. While the IoT approaches in [7]- [12] allow complicated applications to be developed, they provide limited guarantees on application correctness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%