Designing fault-tolerant SOA based on design diversity

Abstract

Background: Over recent years, software developers have been evaluating the benefits of both Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) and software fault tolerance techniques based on design diversity. This is achieved by creating fault-tolerant composite services that leverage functionally-equivalent services. Three major design issues need to be considered while building software fault-tolerant architectures based on design diversity: (i) selection of variants; (ii) selection of an adjudication algorithm to choose one of the results; and (iii) execution of variants. In addition, applications based on SOA need to function effectively in a dynamic environment where it is necessary to postpone decisions until runtime. In this scenario, control is highly distributed and involves conflicting user requirements. We aim to support the software architect in the design of fault-tolerant compositions. Methods: Leveraging a taxonomy for fault-tolerant systems, this paper proposes guidelines to aid software architects in making key design decisions. The taxonomy is used as the basis for defining a set of guidelines to support the architect in making decisions related to fault tolerance in SOA. The same taxonomy is used in a systematic literature review of solutions for fault-tolerant composite services. The review investigates how existing approaches for fault-tolerant composite services address design diversity issues and also specific issues related to SOA. Results: The contribution of this work is twofold: (i) a set of guidelines for supporting the design of fault-tolerant SOA, based on a taxonomy for fault tolerance techniques; and (ii) a systematic literature review of existing solutions for designing fault-tolerant compositions using design diversity. Conclusion: Although existing solutions have made significant contributions to the development of fault-tolerant SOAs, there is a lack of approaches for fault-tolerant service composition that support strategies with diverse quality requirements and encompassing sophisticated context-aware capabilities. This paper discusses which design issues have been addressed by existing diversity-based approaches for fault-tolerant composite services. Finally, practical issues and difficulties are summarized and directions for future work are suggested.

Multimedia Teaching Platform Construction for Fashion Design Based on Simulation and Synchronous Teaching System

“…The original plain and manual teaching gradually tends to digitization and automation [3]. CAD and Photoshop have played an important role in college design teaching.…”

Design of frameworks for self‐adaptive service‐oriented applications: A systematic analysis

“…Nascimento et al 34 argued that software architects should use guidelines to support the identification of design issues and solutions in order to avoid neglecting important requirements related to fault tolerance. Considering this scenario, this study presented an SLR based on 17 studies to support the design of fault‐tolerant SOA‐based applications.…”

“…Such a gap has hindered the representation of Self‐Apps, and the evolution of applications when an adaptation activity is performed. In addition, Nascimento et al 34 investigated the design of fault‐tolerant software architectures for the SOA domain, since these applications need to operate in a dynamic environment where decisions can be taken at runtime. These decisions may involve architectural changes, or changes in choreography and in the composition of services. Automated support .…”

Tolerance in Model-Driven Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review with Model-Driven Tool Support

“…Only two studies on existing work relating fault-tolerance to software engineering problems could be found. Nascimento et al (Nascimento et al 2014) analysed literature on the design of fault-tolerant Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) using design diversity, deriving guidelines for fault-tolerant SOA design and proposing a taxonomy for useful techniques in this respect. A mapping study for fault-tolerant Internet of Things (IoT) applications (Moghaddam & Muccini 2019) identifies key factors for tolerant systems, including the use of micro-services and the distribution of IoT components.…”