2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Destructive testing and computer modeling of a scale prestressed concrete I-girder bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These works demonstrated how existing PC bridges with none‐to‐slight damage or deterioration ensured satisfactory load‐bearing capacity, overperforming structural requirements by code provisions. Nonetheless, experimental tests on full‐scale specimens could be highly demanding, 18 this being the reason why reduced‐scale PC girders/decks have been commonly studied 19–22 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These works demonstrated how existing PC bridges with none‐to‐slight damage or deterioration ensured satisfactory load‐bearing capacity, overperforming structural requirements by code provisions. Nonetheless, experimental tests on full‐scale specimens could be highly demanding, 18 this being the reason why reduced‐scale PC girders/decks have been commonly studied 19–22 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, experimental tests on full-scale specimens could be highly demanding, 18 this being the reason why reduced-scale PC girders/decks have been commonly studied. [19][20][21][22] In the last decades, numerical methods were adopted to study the response of PC structures focusing on different aspects. Based on the experimental tests on PC samples, the well-known finite elements (FEs) software package Abaqus FEA ® had shown to be able to predict not only the structural behavior at both system and sectional scale (i.e., force-displacement and moment-curvature relationships 23,24 ) but also the local response parameters (i.e., tensile cracking, release of the strands, end anchorages [25][26][27][28] ) of PC members with good accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision was made to use steel with the same strength as the steel bars to repair the damaged main steel bars, and stirrup and concrete with the same strength as the original concrete was used to repair the concrete of the bottom plate, and at the same time, the cracks were closed and strengthened with steel plates [ 25 ]. To study the ultimate bearing capacity of the damaged girder after repair and strengthening, destructive tests were conducted on an undamaged girder and the repaired girder strengthened by steel plates [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ], and the destructive process was simulated through detailed analysis [ 31 , 32 ]. The actual bearing capacity of the repaired girder strengthened by steel plates was evaluated by contrasting the data of the destructive tests and a thorough study of the two girders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the actual bearing capacity is assessed mainly according to the reduction and correction of the design bearing capacity, based on the limit state method for highway bridges in China. The actual ultimate bearing capacity can be obtained by carrying out failure tests of bridges, which are about to be torn down [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%