2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00371-013-0884-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting siblings in image pairs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six different stimuli sets were used, each containing 60 identically-sized color images of either unfamiliar faces 31,32 (two different datasets were used in Experiment 1 and with negative affective stimuli we also used three additional stimuli not from the official IAPS dataset, which were found to induce negative affect in another independent study 35 . All IAPS stimuli were rescaled to identical size (533 × 400 pixels).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six different stimuli sets were used, each containing 60 identically-sized color images of either unfamiliar faces 31,32 (two different datasets were used in Experiment 1 and with negative affective stimuli we also used three additional stimuli not from the official IAPS dataset, which were found to induce negative affect in another independent study 35 . All IAPS stimuli were rescaled to identical size (533 × 400 pixels).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six different stimuli sets were used, each containing 60 identically-sized color images of either unfamiliar faces 31,32 (two different datasets were used in Experiment In experiments with negative affective stimuli we also used three additional stimuli not from the official IAPS dataset, which were found to induce negative affect in another independent study 35 . All IAPS stimuli were rescaled to identical size (533 × 400 pixels).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, HQFaces [32]: a database of 97 pairs of siblings' facial images, all photographed under the same lighting conditions; the subjects are Caucasian, ranging from 13 to 50 years of age, out of which 43% are female. For the purpose of our experiments, 148 frontal non smiling images were collected from this database.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%