2004
DOI: 10.1021/ci034220i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Classification of Organophosphate Nerve Agent Simulants Using Support Vector Machines with Multiarray Sensors

Abstract: The need for rapid and accurate detection systems is expanding and the utilization of cross-reactive sensor arrays to detect chemical warfare agents in conjunction with novel computational techniques may prove to be a potential solution to this challenge. We have investigated the detection, prediction, and classification of various organophosphate (OP) nerve agent simulants using sensor arrays with a novel learning scheme known as support vector machines (SVMs). The OPs tested include parathion, malathion, dic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the performance of the GC-TCD was better than the GC-PSAD in terms of peak resolution and reproducibility, there is a lot of promise on the improvement of the PSAD because its inherent flexibility in changing the nature and ratios of monomers and dopants to tune its selectivity on one hand or to widen the scope of responding analytes on the other. Also, because of the many and variable sensor signals that are possible from this kind of system, there is the possibility of combining novel machine learning programs that can aid in the rapid and cost effective identification of analytes as we have just recently demonstrated [20]. In that case it would have been impossible to identify with an electronic nose system alone or too expensive with a GC-MS system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the performance of the GC-TCD was better than the GC-PSAD in terms of peak resolution and reproducibility, there is a lot of promise on the improvement of the PSAD because its inherent flexibility in changing the nature and ratios of monomers and dopants to tune its selectivity on one hand or to widen the scope of responding analytes on the other. Also, because of the many and variable sensor signals that are possible from this kind of system, there is the possibility of combining novel machine learning programs that can aid in the rapid and cost effective identification of analytes as we have just recently demonstrated [20]. In that case it would have been impossible to identify with an electronic nose system alone or too expensive with a GC-MS system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LS-SVM is an evolutionary version of the standard support vector machines (SVM) and has been widely developed for the optimal control of nonlinear systems and spectral calibration (Suykens et al, 2002;Bao, Liu, Kong, Sun, He & Qiu, 2014). This method utilizes nonlinear map function, projects input features to a high dimensional space, and adopts the Lagrange multiplier to compute the partial differentiation of each feature for converting the optimization problem into resolving the linear algebraic equation (Sadik et al, 2004). The radial basis function (RBF) as a popular kernel function is normally used in LS-SVM and the grid-search technique is usually applied to determine the optimal parameters obtained from the RBF kernel: the regularization parameter g and the width of RBF parameter s 2 (Suykens, Vandewalle, & De Moor, 2001).…”
Section: Ls-svm Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVM is not only good at classification (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) but also widely used in feature selection. (9,(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33) In this paper, a new method such as the embedded method for feature selection, which is specifically designed to work with SVM and ICA, is introduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%