Detection of High-Performance Wheat Genotypes and Genetic Stability to Determine Complex Interplay between Genotypes and Environments

Abstract

Abiotic stress decreases crop production worldwide. In order to recommend suitable genotypes for cultivation under water deficit and heat stress conditions, an overall understanding of the genetic basis and plant responses to these stresses and their interactions with the environment is required. To achieve these goals, the multitrait genotype-ideotype distance index (MGIDI) was utilized to recognize abiotic-stress-tolerant wheat genotypes, and the weighted average of absolute scores (WAASB) index as well as the superiority index, which enables weighting between the mean performance and stability (WAASBY), were utilized to recognize high-yielding and stable genotypes. Twenty wheat genotypes were examined to determine the abiotic stress tolerance capacity of the investigated genotypes under nine test environments (three seasons × three treatments). Abiotic stress significantly decreased most morpho-physiological and all agronomic traits; however, some abiotic-stress-tolerant genotypes expressed a slight reduction in the measured traits as compared with the control group. G04, G12, G13, and G17 were identified as convenient and stable genotypes using the MGIDI index under all environments. Based on the scores of the genotype index (WAASB), G01, G05, G12, and G17 were selected as superior genotypes with considerable stability in terms of the grain yield (GY). G04, G06, G12, and G18 were classified as cluster (I), the productive and stable genotypes, using the WAASBY superiority index. The combined indices (MGIDI and WAASB) and (MGIDI and WAASBY) revealed genotypes G12 and G17 and genotypes G04 and G12, respectively, as the most stable candidates. Therefore, these are considered novel genetic resources for improving productivity and stabilizing GY in wheat programs under optimal conditions, water deficit, and heat stress. The genotype G12 was jointly expressed in all three indices. Stability measures using WAASB may help breeders with decision-making when selecting genotypes and conducting multi-environment trials. Hence, these methods, if jointly conducted, can serve as a powerful tool to assist breeders in multi-environment trials.

Multi-trait selection for agronomic performance and drought tolerance among durum wheat genotypes evaluated under rainfed and irrigated environments

“…This is in agreement with previous studies that indirect selection for phenological traits and kernel weight under rainfed conditions increases grain yield of durum wheat (Mohammadi et al 2011b;Mohammadi and Amri 2013). Therefore, selection based on multi-trait stability index may collect genotypes with superior adaptability to the prevailing climatic conditions, which is very important for hybridization programmes (Al-Ashkar et al 2023;Hussain et al, 2021;Olivoto et al, 2019aOlivoto et al, , 2019b. According to MTSI genotypes G6, G19, G20 and G2 showed highest performing and stable across rainfed environments, while across irrigated environments breeding lines G20, G6, G24 and G18 expressed highest performance and stability based on the investigated traits.…”

“…Therefore, selection based on multi-trait stability index may collect genotypes with superior adaptability to the prevailing climatic conditions, which is very important for hybridization programmes (Al-Ashkar et al. 2023; Hussain et al. , 2021; Olivoto et al.…”

“…The pattern view of strengths and weaknesses of genotypes, which shows the ratio of multi-trait stability index explained by each factor, is an important tool to identify the strengths and weaknesses of studied genotypes (Al-Ashkar et al. , 2023; Norman et al. , 2022).…”

“…MTSI is a useful technique for selection of genotypes based on multiple traits because it provides a robust and simple selection process (Olivoto et al, 2019a(Olivoto et al, , 2019b. This method has been successfully applied to select high-yielding genotypes in variable environments in several crop species (Al-Ashkar et al 2023;Norman et al, 2022;Olivoto et al, 2019a;Zuffo et al, 2020). This study was undertaken to evaluate 25 durum wheat genotypes under rainfed and irrigated conditions during three cropping seasons to (i) identify the stability traits associated with the mean performance and (ii) identify genotypes with the best performance and drought tolerance in high-and low-rainfall environments.…”

“…This method has been successfully applied to select high-yielding genotypes in variable environments in several crop species (Al-Ashkar et al. 2023; Norman et al. , 2022; Olivoto et al.…”