2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-019-8572-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of karst features using ground-penetrating radar: a case study from the western limestone plateau, Assiut, Egypt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anomaly of the ring‐type shape is visualized at the opposite side of the tomb entrance. This is interpreted as a subsurface premise that contains a feature of concentric shape located in the intensively fractured rocks at relatively small depth (as a result of quarry development, Ebraheem & Ibrahim, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anomaly of the ring‐type shape is visualized at the opposite side of the tomb entrance. This is interpreted as a subsurface premise that contains a feature of concentric shape located in the intensively fractured rocks at relatively small depth (as a result of quarry development, Ebraheem & Ibrahim, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these challenges, geophysical methods and remote sensing techniques have emerged as valuable tools for the non-invasive location of underground cavities. Among geophysical methods, electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) (Cardarelli et al 2006;Park et al 2014), ground penetrating radar (GPR) (Ebraheem and Ibrahim 2019;Pilecki et al 2021), microgravity (Arisona et al 2023), and seismic methods (Liang et al 2018;Rao et al 2021) have been widely applied to investigate karst networks, sinkholes, and underground instabilities (Liu et al 2023). Satellite-based monitoring techniques, such as Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR), have also succeeded in detecting cavities and monitoring the evolution of sinkholes and subsidence-prone areas, demonstrating the ability to provide wide spatial data coverage with adequate geometric and temporal resolution (Malinowska et al 2019;Esposito et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GPR method is an efficient, non‐destructive and cost‐effective tool for characterizing different sedimentary heterogeneities and structures (Bristow & Jol, 2003; Carrozzo et al., 2008; Ebraheem & Ibrahim, 2019; Leucci & De Giorgi, 2010). However, it can see below and into solid materials using radar waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%