2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of software quality: A survey of information systems project managers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(66 reference statements)
1
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, 'efficiency' attribute is not considered as it is viewed as an internal quality attribute dealing with time behavior and computing resources consumed [15]. Therefore, four main quality attributes, viz., Functionality, Reliability, Maintainability and, Usability are considered as measures of Software Quality (SQ) in our study.…”
Section: A Software Quality Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, 'efficiency' attribute is not considered as it is viewed as an internal quality attribute dealing with time behavior and computing resources consumed [15]. Therefore, four main quality attributes, viz., Functionality, Reliability, Maintainability and, Usability are considered as measures of Software Quality (SQ) in our study.…”
Section: A Software Quality Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes the following sub-characteristics: suitability, accuracy, interoperability, compliance and security. Functionality expresses the ability of a system to provide the required services and functions, when used under specified Conditions [15].…”
Section: ) Functionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we accepted only four articles because we had difficulties to interpret any type of definition for success/failure from most of the articles published in that journal. Articles that include the customer's perspective only [13], [32], [34], [36], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], …”
Section: Answers To Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most studies on the determinants of process maturity and the delivery of high quality software products are conducted in large firms in developed countries (Gefen & Zviran, 2006;Gorla & Lin, 2010), with only a few being empirical study (Krishnan & Keller, 1999;Niazi & Babar, 2009), and even less being conducted on small firms in developing countries (Avgerou, 2008;Horvat, Rozman, & Györkös, 2000;Niazi et al, 2010;Pino, Pardo, Garcia, & Piattini, 2010;Richardson & von Wangenheim, 2007). In addition, it was discovered that there is little research in this domain in the English-speaking Caribbean (Chevers & Duggan, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%