1991
DOI: 10.1364/josab.8.001545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of absolute transition probabilities in neutral cerium from branching ratio and lifetime measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have chosen this energy region to cover the range explored in the experiment [15], where absolute values were derived for 228 of the most intense lines of neutral Ce between 10706 and 22184 cm −1 .…”
Section: B Dipole Matrix Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have chosen this energy region to cover the range explored in the experiment [15], where absolute values were derived for 228 of the most intense lines of neutral Ce between 10706 and 22184 cm −1 .…”
Section: B Dipole Matrix Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the experimentally observed 228 lines include transitions between levels with various total angular momenta between J = 1 and 8 (|J i − J k | ≤ 1, of course) whereas we have about 500 hundred lines with just J i = J k = 4 in our calculation in the analogous energy range. This means that in [15] only the strongest 10% or less of all lines have in fact been measured. The very suggestive agreement with the PT distribution in Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The branching ratio is generally determined from the relative intensities of emission lines over a wide wavelength range [5,10,[12][13][14]. As compared to the light elements, however, this method has disadvantages for Gd.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their paper, Flambaum et al compared the line strengths measured in cesium by Bisson et al [32] with PorterThomas distribution. The agreement was good, but the authors refined the results taking into account the minimal threshold intensity that can be experimentally measured, within the modified Porter-Thomas distribution…”
Section: Distribution For the Line Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%