2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2015.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the applicability and limits of void and delamination detection in concrete structures using infrared thermography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
65
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The applicability and limits of void and delamination detection in concrete structures using infrared thermography was performed by Patricia Cotic et al in 2015 [18]. They conducted experiments of 51 artificially defects with sizes from 1.2 to 10 cm located at depths from 0.5 to 12.5 cm in concrete, using active infrared thermography.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The applicability and limits of void and delamination detection in concrete structures using infrared thermography was performed by Patricia Cotic et al in 2015 [18]. They conducted experiments of 51 artificially defects with sizes from 1.2 to 10 cm located at depths from 0.5 to 12.5 cm in concrete, using active infrared thermography.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique gives reliable results in the evaluation of the near-surface region with the depth of defects less than 10 cm [8,14]. In several researches, when the ratio between the size and the depth of delamination (so-called width-to-depth ratio or WTDR) is smaller than 2.0, the delamination was considered undetectable [15,16], while other authors stated that delamination with a WTDR smaller than 2.0 could be detected using advanced image processing techniques, as discussed in Section 2 [3,6,11,[17][18][19]. In this study, the Long Pulsed Thermography (LPT) technique, one of the most common methods of active infrared thermography, is used to clarify the effects of depth, heating time, and steel bars on the detectability capacity of delamination inside a concrete specimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us consider a reinforced concrete element, for example a vertical one such as a pillar or a wall, in which a segregation phenomenon occurred during hardening, determining the formation of a volume full of cavities that can be assimilated by size to the MC of the test. This kind of defect is commonly simulated by means of embedded voids [58][59][60][61][62] as the MC of the test. Figure 16 shows the overestimate of the usable cross section of the element net of the section of the defect as a function of the size of the defect and of the I index reported in Table 3.…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example and by accepting a rough calculation, if the element is loaded by axial compression the overlap of the resistant section results in a corresponding overestimate of the section capacity load. Similarly, if we consider the presence of a delamination or detachment area that can be assimilated to the plastic elements P 1,2,3 of the test, as is common in literature [61][62][63][64], depending on the spacing and the position of the measurement points the defect is not detected or it is overestimated even by 150%. Additionally, in this case there can be repercussions on the correct evaluation of the structural integrity and therefore on the refurbishment planning.…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several NDT methods, such as the ultrasonic pulse velocity method [3,4], acoustic emission [5,6,7,8], infrared thermography [9,10] and the pulse-echo method [11], have been applied in structural damage detection. These methods have shown various degrees of success in assessing structural damage severity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%