2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceca.2007.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining calcium concentration in heterogeneous model systems using multiple indicators

Abstract: Intracellular free calcium concentrations ([Ca2+]i) are assessed by measuring indicator fluorescence in entire cells or subcellular regions using fluorescence microscopy. [Ca2+]i is calculated using equations which link fluorescence intensities (or intensity ratios) to calcium concentrations [G. Grynkiewicz, M. Poenie, R.Y. Tsien, A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties, J. Biol. Chem. 260 (1985) 3440-3450]. However, if calcium ions are heterogeneously distributed with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7072]), a difference often masked by excessive Ca 2+ buffering by an indicator [71, 73, 66] and/or presence of optically unresolved Ca 2+ domains [74]. In either case, the low affinity indicators are far more likely to report actual [Ca 2+ ] i than their high affinity counterparts [71, 73, 74]. The fact that ACR-1-LA, but not ACR-1, detects this difference shows that the indicators maintain their Ca 2+ affinity status in situ , although their apparent dissociation constants (K d ) might vary from those determined in vitro (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7072]), a difference often masked by excessive Ca 2+ buffering by an indicator [71, 73, 66] and/or presence of optically unresolved Ca 2+ domains [74]. In either case, the low affinity indicators are far more likely to report actual [Ca 2+ ] i than their high affinity counterparts [71, 73, 74]. The fact that ACR-1-LA, but not ACR-1, detects this difference shows that the indicators maintain their Ca 2+ affinity status in situ , although their apparent dissociation constants (K d ) might vary from those determined in vitro (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpreting these signals can be complicated if the region contains a non-uniform distribution of Ca 2+ ions, an issue that should be considered when inferring [Ca 2+ ] i activity from calcium indicator fluorescence intensity (Hyrc et al . 2007 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ER) and those with lower Ca 2+ (e.g. cytosol) so this technique may underestimate [Ca 2+ ] ER (Hyrc et al. 2007), but such averaging is unlikely to account for the observed decrease in [Ca 2+ ] ER in proteasome inhibitor‐treated cultures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%