2022
DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2022.2043646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining performance shaping factors to assess human error in the emergency response team in chemical process industries: a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PSFs were designed to improve the performance under expected and benign conditions, and not in risky scenarios [29]. Furthermore, one of the main problems with the existing PSF taxonomy is that they overlap.…”
Section: Csfs Of Performance Shaping Factors (Psfs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PSFs were designed to improve the performance under expected and benign conditions, and not in risky scenarios [29]. Furthermore, one of the main problems with the existing PSF taxonomy is that they overlap.…”
Section: Csfs Of Performance Shaping Factors (Psfs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human error (HE) is one of the most common causes of accidents in many industries. Previous studies indicate that HE contributes to 30-90% of all accidents in work environments despite strict safety procedures in those industries [20]. Common types of human errors (HEs) in assembly processes include unsecured links, missing parts, improper part installation, the inadequate application of force to fasteners, breakage during assembly, and contamination by foreign object debris [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%