2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-011-0443-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining Subsurface Fracture Characteristics from the Azimuthal Square Array Resistivity Survey at Igarra, Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fractures, which act as conduit for fluid and contaminant transport, contribute to azimuthal resistivity variation by creating zones of contrasting electrical properties in the bedrock and thereby increasing hydraulic and electrical conductivity along the direction of fracture strike while decreasing same at direction perpendicular to it (Obiadi et al 2013). The azimuthal resistivity survey using the square array (Habberjam 1967) was done by rotating the whole electrode array through 180°at regular increments starting with an initial array orientation aligned in the direction of true north.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractures, which act as conduit for fluid and contaminant transport, contribute to azimuthal resistivity variation by creating zones of contrasting electrical properties in the bedrock and thereby increasing hydraulic and electrical conductivity along the direction of fracture strike while decreasing same at direction perpendicular to it (Obiadi et al 2013). The azimuthal resistivity survey using the square array (Habberjam 1967) was done by rotating the whole electrode array through 180°at regular increments starting with an initial array orientation aligned in the direction of true north.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Figure 1 Location map showing the study area (modified after Oloto and Anyanwu 2013).
Figure 2 Geological map of the Igarra area showing study areas lithology (modified after Obiadi et al 2013).
Figure 3 (a&b) Sketch showing the data flow in an XRF analysis (Macdonald 2004).
…”
Section: Geologic Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%