2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the epidemiologic, outcome, and prognostic factors of oral malignant melanoma by using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mucosal melanoma is typically aggressive and is associated with a poor prognosis. Retrospective analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data from 1973‐2012 indicates that the 5‐year OS rate is approximately 25% among patients with oral mucosal melanoma . Photon RT is an option as adjuvant or definitive treatment, although mucosal melanoma is also considered radioresistant, and Wushou et al reported that the 3‐year OS rate was 0% among 21 patients with primary oral mucosal melanoma treated using RT .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mucosal melanoma is typically aggressive and is associated with a poor prognosis. Retrospective analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data from 1973‐2012 indicates that the 5‐year OS rate is approximately 25% among patients with oral mucosal melanoma . Photon RT is an option as adjuvant or definitive treatment, although mucosal melanoma is also considered radioresistant, and Wushou et al reported that the 3‐year OS rate was 0% among 21 patients with primary oral mucosal melanoma treated using RT .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retrospective analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data from 1973-2012 indicates that the 5-year OS rate is approximately 25% among patients with oral mucosal melanoma. 29 Photon RT is an option as adjuvant or definitive treatment, although mucosal melanoma is also considered radioresistant, and Wushou et al reported that the 3-year OS rate was 0% among 21 patients with primary oral mucosal melanoma treated using RT. 5 Interestingly, C-ion RT appears to provide benefits in terms of local control and survival relative to photon RT, as we reported 5-year rates of 89.4% for local control and 57.4% for OS among 19 patients who only received Cion RT for oral mucosal melanomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rare disease of mucosal melanoma of the oral cavity has consistently been associated with a poor outcome. Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data from the period of 1973‐2012 have indicated a 5‐year OS rate of approximately 25% among patients with oral mucosal melanoma . Complete surgical resection with clear margins is the pillar of oral mucosal melanoma management, and optimal results might be expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data from the period of 1973-2012 have indicated a 5-year OS rate of approximately 25% among patients with oral mucosal melanoma. 20 Complete surgical resection with clear margins is the pillar of oral mucosal melanoma management, and optimal results might be expected. However, it is frequently difficult for oral mucosal melanoma to keep a tumor-free surgical margin of 1-2 cm, which is generally required and accepted for cutaneous melanoma, as the extent of histopathologically assessed tumor expanse is usually greater than that of the gross disease, and it might include the pharynx and paranasal sinus.…”
Section: Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this time is short it permits a less aggressive and mutilating treatment, in addition to increasing the chance of survival. 17 The period of time until treatment includes the beginning of symptoms felt by the patient, looking for a professional, the final diagnosis and the beginning of therapy. There are two characteristics in this story: the patient himself and the health professional.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%