2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0967-0645(02)00589-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining true particulate organic carbon: bottles, pumps and methodologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
81
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5). This is most likely due to an elevation in bottle POC as has been confirmed by a range of studies that directly compare bottles and pumps using small pore sized filters (0.7-1 Am diameter) typically made of glass or quartz fiber Gardner et al, 2003;Liu et al, 2005). At low POC concentrations (few AM POC) this bias has been attributed to dissolved organic carbon (DOC) sorption on to the filter.…”
Section: Methodological Issues-traditional Particle Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5). This is most likely due to an elevation in bottle POC as has been confirmed by a range of studies that directly compare bottles and pumps using small pore sized filters (0.7-1 Am diameter) typically made of glass or quartz fiber Gardner et al, 2003;Liu et al, 2005). At low POC concentrations (few AM POC) this bias has been attributed to dissolved organic carbon (DOC) sorption on to the filter.…”
Section: Methodological Issues-traditional Particle Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This bias would be higher in high DOC surface waters and more evident in small volume bottle samples . One alternative explanation is simply that bottle POC is higher due to the smaller pore size of GFF filters (nominal pore size of 0.7 Am) used with bottle POC methods vs. the quartz filters (nominal pore size of 1 Am) typically used with pumps (Dunne et al, 1997;Gardner et al, 2003). For example, Dunne et al (1997) compared collection of chlorophyll and 234 Th from bottle and pump pairs and concluded that pump POC concentrations had to be increased by a factor of 1.1 to 2.3 for accurate comparison with bottle POC because of the pore size differences and the abundance of small cells in their study.…”
Section: Methodological Issues-traditional Particle Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The introduction of the first commercial transmissometers spawned the investigation of PM and particulate organic carbon concentration (POC) relationships with beam attenuation coefficient (Bishop, 1986(Bishop, , 1999Bishop et al, 1999Bishop et al, , 1992Bishop and Joyce, 1986;Bishop and Wood, 2008;Cetinic et al, 2012;Gardner, 1989a;Gardner et al, 1985Gardner et al, , 2003Gardner et al, , 1993Hill et al, 2011;Karageorgis et al, 2008Karageorgis et al, , 2014Neukermans et al, 2012). The beam attenuation coefficient was found to be a better proxy for POC than for PM for waters dominated by biogenic particles, having a smaller intercept and a significantly higher correlation coefficient (Bishop, 1999;Gardner et al, 2003).…”
Section: Commercial Technology To Measure Optical Properties In-situmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beam attenuation coefficient was found to be a better proxy for POC than for PM for waters dominated by biogenic particles, having a smaller intercept and a significantly higher correlation coefficient (Bishop, 1999;Gardner et al, 2003).…”
Section: Commercial Technology To Measure Optical Properties In-situmentioning
confidence: 99%