Developing a hospital accreditation model: a Delphi study

Abstract

Background Hospital accreditation (HA) is an external evaluation of a hospital’s structures, processes and results by an independent professional accreditation body using pre-established optimum standards. The Iranian hospital accreditation system faces several challenges. The overall aim of this study was to develop a model for Iran national hospital accreditation program. Methods This research uses the modified Delphi technique to develop and verify a model of hospital accreditation. The first draft of the HA model was introduced through a critical review of 20 pioneer accreditation models and semi-structured interviews with 151 key informants from Public, private, semi-public, charity and military hospitals in Iran. Three rounds of Delphi were conducted with 28 experts of hospital accreditation to verify the proposed model. Panel members were selected from authors of research articles and key speakers in the area of hospital accreditation, senior managers of the country’s health system, university professors in the fields of health policy and management across the country. Results A comprehensive model for hospital accreditation was introduced and verified in this study. The HA model has ten constructs of which seven are enablers (“Management and leadership”, “Planning”, “Education and Research”, “employee management”, “patient management”, “resource management”, and “process management”) and three are the results (“employee results”, “patient and society results” and “hospital results”). These constructs were further broken into 43 sub-constructs. The enablers and results scored 65 and 35% of the model’s total scores respectively. Then, about 150 accreditation standards were written and verified. Conclusions A comprehensive hospital accreditation model was developed and verified. Proper attention to structures, processes and outcomes and systemic thinking during the development of the model is one of the advantages of the hospital accreditation model developed in this study. Hospital accreditation bodies can use this model to develop or revise their hospital accreditation models.

Occurrence and types of medication error and its associated factors in a reference teaching hospital in northeastern Iran: a retrospective study of medical records

“…To achieve this goal, the third generation of the National Accreditation Program has paid special attention to patient safety, and one of the eight axes of this program is dedicated to the management of drugs and equipment. Thus, the drug management consists of nine standards, including ensuring the hospital's access to drugs, safe storage of drugs, prescription drugs, supply and distribution of drugs, management of drug consumption, continuous evaluation of the process of prescription and drug consumption, monitoring of expired drugs, review of drugs prescribed and medication error control [ 19 , 20 ].…”

Revolutionizing Healthcare: Lessons Learned from an Integrative Approach to Transforming the Hospital Accreditation System in Lebanon

“…This study addresses the above-mentioned gap by employing a rigorous and multi-faceted methodology for developing and piloting hospital accreditation standards in Lebanon. The Donabedian model was employed in this study to ensure a comprehensive approach for continuous quality improvement, mainly emphasizing structure, process, and outcome measures for improved quality of care [22] moving into an outcome-based accreditation system.…”

Society-based Infection Prevention and Control Guidelines after COVID-19: A Delphi Study.

“…In this study, we recruited a group of experts, who were selected for their expertise in infection prevention and control and epidemiology (public health). The number of experts was 18, a suitable number for this type of study [15]. Political measures and public places' infection control measures, e.g., provision of scal and human resources for maintaining IPC and occupational health programs, which are implemented as a response to emerging needs, preparedness for possible outbreaks, the presence of a disaster plan, employee preparedness to be part of the implementation of any disaster/outbreak plan.…”