2020
DOI: 10.3390/bios10110156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a Low-Cost, Simple-to-Use Electrochemical Sensor for the Detection of Circulating Tumour DNA in Human Fluids

Abstract: It is well-known that two major issues, preventing improved outcomes from cancer are late diagnosis and the evolution of drug resistance during chemotherapy, therefore technologies that address these issues can have a transformative effect on healthcare workflows. In this work we present a simple, low-cost DNA biosensor that was developed specifically to detect mutations in a key oncogene (KRAS). The sensor employed was a screen-printed array of carbon electrodes, used to perform parallel measurements of DNA h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we expected a reduction in the peak current when specific DNA hybridisation had taken place, and this was found to be the case for lower concentrations of DNA (pico-to-low nanomolar concentrations) as shown in Figure 2B,C. For nanomolar (>10 nM) and micromolar concentrations, an increase in the peak current following hybridisation was consistently observed (and has also been observed in other data from our lab involving SPCEs) [31] for carbon electrodes which is likely explained by the high surface density of hybridised DNA amplicons changing the interfacial properties of the electrode and, therefore, altering the electrochemical response. The underlying physical mechanism of this effect is actively under investigation.…”
Section: Dna Sensor Hybridisation Specificitysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Therefore, we expected a reduction in the peak current when specific DNA hybridisation had taken place, and this was found to be the case for lower concentrations of DNA (pico-to-low nanomolar concentrations) as shown in Figure 2B,C. For nanomolar (>10 nM) and micromolar concentrations, an increase in the peak current following hybridisation was consistently observed (and has also been observed in other data from our lab involving SPCEs) [31] for carbon electrodes which is likely explained by the high surface density of hybridised DNA amplicons changing the interfacial properties of the electrode and, therefore, altering the electrochemical response. The underlying physical mechanism of this effect is actively under investigation.…”
Section: Dna Sensor Hybridisation Specificitysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Further optimisation can be made using isothermal amplification which can cut down the number of thermal cycles and, in turn, decrease the overall amplification time from 1 h to 30 min [ 53 ]. As our previously published work shows that we were able to detect KRAS amplicons in plasma to mimic a ‘clinical sample’ [ 54 ], near future work will explore the detection of non-specified clinical samples containing different KRAS mutations and mutations in other genes involved in cancer, e.g., P53 and BRCA1. Analysing multiple mutations simultaneously in a given sample without prior knowledge of the alterations using multiplex techniques and direct detection of ctDNA from cancer patient samples will support the future direction of PoC clinical testing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capture DNA probes were immobilized onto the electrode’s surface, while the hybridization of the target was performed through ruthenium redox mediator and cyclic voltametric measurements. The fabrication time of the sensor is about 1 h, the analysis time is 3.5 h, while the LOD is 4 copies/ng for the single and 0.58 ng/μL for the multiplex format [ 37 , 38 ]. An urchin-like gold nanocrystal-multiple graphene aerogel was also exploited for ctDNA analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%