Developing brownfields via public-private-people partnerships

Costa, Sandra Oliveira e; Kellecioğlu, Ilhan; Weber, Ryan

doi:10.30689/r2018:1.1403-2503

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…9 This proposed cooperation model was raised just after that previous concept (public-private sectors cooperation) had been criticized due to lack of transparency and non-participation of people in programs. 10 Participation of people, along with the public and private sectors, can make the public sector accountable and also help reach an effective implementation. 11 This study aims to investigate 4P in the COVID-19 response throughout Iran.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Public-Private-People Partnerships (4P) for Improving the Response to COVID-19 in Iran

Seddighi

Salmani

et al. 2020

Disaster med. public health prep.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Public–Private–People partnership (4P) is a significant element in disaster response. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) as a pandemic has been the worst disaster in the last decades in Iran in terms of exposure and magnitude. In order to respond effectively, the Iranian Government needs an extra capacity, which may be provided by the private sector and people. This study aims to collect evidences of 4P pertaining to the COVID-19 response in Iran from February to April 2020. Partnership case studies are classified into 3 categories: (1) Public–private partnerships; (2) public–people partnerships; and (3) private–people partnerships. It was found that the Iranian Government has removed or diminished some of the barriers to cooperation. There was also more cooperation between the people, the private sector, and the public sector than during normal times (vs disasters). People participated in the response procedure through some associations or groups, such as religious and ethnic communities, as well as through non-governmental organizations. It has been shown that 4P is vital in disaster response and, in particular, to epidemics. The government can be more active in partnerships with the private sector and people in emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Enhancing social capital, institutionalization, and developing required infrastructures by the government will improve public–private partnerships.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Public-Private-People Partnerships (4P) for Improving the Response to COVID-19 in Iran

Seddighi

Salmani

et al. 2020

Disaster med. public health prep.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…With also the input of Irazábal, the 'people' component is intended to be the community, with the aim of being taken into consideration in their neighborhood renewal, particularly after natural-disaster-induced displacements Oliveira e Costa et al [43] 2018 P4's 'people' partners would be one or more of the following: local businesses, NGOs, future tenants, community groups, financial institutions, property developers, and public planning agencies Maraña et al [41] 2020 Reference to Majamaa (2008) [46] Boniotti [33] 2021 Reference to Majamaa (2008) [46]…”

Section: Letelier Et Al Published "Contesting Tina: Community Plannin...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The aim of the project was to bridge public and private partners with citizens and other tertiary stakeholders, in order to develop and test innovative methods of engagement, as well as bottom-up solutions for the redevelopment of brownfield sites. The scope of the study was more intended to be on relationship-building testing between traditional stakeholders with non-traditional stakeholders, rather than building up formal partnerships for the redevelopment of large built environments [43].…”

Section: Case Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Critique on Public–Private–People Partnerships: From a Definitional Inconsistency to the Partnering Dilemma in Today’s Housing Conjunction

Miranda-Poggys

Morena

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper showcases the first exhaustive literature review on the public–private–people partnership (4P), as a concept on its own, its backstory, its proposed definitions, and multiple interpretations throughout the last fifteen years. Beyond mapping the discussion on what does the extra ‘P’—the people—component of these partnerships really mean, and how it is understood by scholars and the traditional public and private partners alike, this work also aims to be the starting point for new research avenues, such as corporate–community cooperation, and urban regeneration through different land use and ownership schemes. Hence, the discussion spreads onto analyzing how the concept is approached from different professional fields—for its inherent interdisciplinarity, despite the perceived scarcity of related literature available—but also onto the ambivalence stemming from the nature of the ‘people’ component itself, its functions, and the relationships—formal or informal—that should be established. Finally, the authors go on to critically place the concept within the current urban and real estate trends in both, the Global North and South, while identifying further gaps in the current literature, for example: given today’s critical housing supply and affordability situations, how to get the public and private sectors interested in partnering with people in a more direct way? What needs to be done? What needs to be further researched?

show abstract

Test-Design, an Experimental Planning Method

Modica¹,

Solero

2022

SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Developing brownfields via public-private-people partnerships

Cited by 4 publications

References 4 publications

Public-Private-People Partnerships (4P) for Improving the Response to COVID-19 in Iran

Public-Private-People Partnerships (4P) for Improving the Response to COVID-19 in Iran

A Critique on Public–Private–People Partnerships: From a Definitional Inconsistency to the Partnering Dilemma in Today’s Housing Conjunction

Test-Design, an Experimental Planning Method

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About