Developing green supply chain management taxonomy-based decision support system

Abstract

Disclaimer UWE has obtained warranties from all depositors as to their title in the material deposited and as to their right to deposit such material. UWE makes no representation or warranties of commercial utility, title, or fitness for a particular purpose or any other warranty, express or implied in respect of any material deposited.UWE makes no representation that the use of the materials will not infringe any patent, copyright, trademark or other property or proprietary rights.UWE accepts no liability for any infringement of intellectual property rights in any material deposited but will remove such material from public view pending investigation in the event of an allegation of any such infringement. ABSTRACTThe aim of this paper is to develop a comprehensive taxonomy of green supply chain management (GSCM) practices and develop a structural equation modelling (SEM) driven decision support system following GSCM taxonomy for managers to provide better understanding of the complex relationship between the external and internal factors and GSCM operational practices. Typology and/or taxonomy play a key role in the development of social science theories. The current taxonomies focus on a single or limited component of the supply chain. Furthermore, they have not been tested using different sample compositions and contexts. In this paper, we empirically replicate Murphy, Poist, and Braunschwieg's (1996) study, as replication is a prerequisite for developing robust concepts and theories. More importantly, we go beyond their study by (a) developing broad (containing the key components of supply chain) taxonomy; (b) broadening the sample by including a wider range of sectors and organisational size; and (c) broadening the geographic scope of the previous studies. Moreover, we include both objective measures and subjective attitudinal measurements. We use a robust two-stage cluster analysis to develop our GSCM taxonomy. The main finding validates the taxonomy proposed by Murphy, Poist, and Braunschwieg (1996) and identifies size, attitude, and level of environmental risk and impact as key mediators between internal drivers, external drivers, and GSCM operational practices.

Green manufacturing supply chain design and operations decision support

“…A comprehensive taxonomy of green supply chain management practices is reported in the article 'Developing green supply chain management taxonomy-based decision support system' by Kumar et al (2015). A two-stage cluster analysis is used for the development of the green supply chain management taxonomy.…”

Lean and Green Paradigms in Logistics: Review of Published Research

“…Environmentalism appears to have arrived as a key issue faced by the logistics managers. Leading logistics textbooks now include the green movement [41] and recycling [42] as emerging environmental logistics issues. As concern for the environment is nowadays of significant importance, we also have to take into account lean logistics.…”

“…Out of a total of 29 considered lean logistics articles there were 55.17% (16) of the research type and 37.93% (11) of the case study type. Out of a total of 56 green logistics articles there were 73.21% (41) of the research type and 14.29% (8) of the case study type. For the considered green and lean logistics articles (13) there were also 67% (8) of the research type and 33% (4) of the conceptual nature.…”

Second-life retailing: a reverse supply chain perspective

“…Businesses are increasingly concerned with the life-cycle implications of their decisions (Hu and Bidanda, 2009;Isaksson et al, 2010), hence SCM is receiving increased attention because of its scope encompassing the continuous flow of materials, funds and information across multiple functional areas within and between supply chain members (Jain et al, 2009). In broad terms, GSCM and SSCM encompass resource saving, product recycling or reuse, green design and harmful material reduction, aiming to improve supply chains' environmental performance (Holt and Ghobadian, 2009;Lau, 2011, Kumar et al, 2014.…”