1989
DOI: 10.1002/dc.2840050317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and application of immunocytochemical staining techniques: A review

Abstract: Since the field of immunocytochemistry was pioneered almost half a century ago, over 30 different immunostaining methods have been developed. Most laboratory investigators, however, are aware of only a few of the more popular techniques. This article, therefore, reviews and places in historical perspective many of the less common methodologies. A discussion of the progression of immunostaining methodology from purely immunologic techniques (employing only antigens, antibodies, and free enzymatic preparations) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Immunocytochemical staining for CD3 (monoclonal mouse anti‐human antibody, clone F7.2.38, DAKO, Denmark) and CD79a (monoclonal mouse anti‐human antibody, clone HM57, DAKO, Denmark) was performed . These antibodies have been demonstrated to cross‐react with the equivalent equine antigens .…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunocytochemical staining for CD3 (monoclonal mouse anti‐human antibody, clone F7.2.38, DAKO, Denmark) and CD79a (monoclonal mouse anti‐human antibody, clone HM57, DAKO, Denmark) was performed . These antibodies have been demonstrated to cross‐react with the equivalent equine antigens .…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of the molecular complexes is crucial to our understanding of signal transduction pathways related to disease progression (Kolch and Pitt, 2010;Papin et al, 2005). Various methods are available to detect protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid interactions, but few are able to analyze individual complexes (Auerbach et al, 2002;Cheng et al, 2004;Collas, 2009;Gavin and Superti-Furga, 2003;Kuo and Allis, 1999;Myers, 1989;Phizicky and Fields, 1995;Stenman et al, 1993;Toby and Golemis, 2001;Williams, 2000). For instance, while conventional immunoprecipitation (IP), which requires a large amount of sample, is currently the standard method for detecting protein-protein interactions, this approach cannot directly detect individual biomolecule complexes or provide an absolute number of complexes present (Jain et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2011;Thompson et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cytospin preparations were also prepared on poly-L-lysine-coated slides and immunocytochemistry was performed with a monoclonal antibody against the FCoV nucleocapsid protein (mouse monoclonal, clone FIPV3-70; Novus Biologicals) using an avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex technique. 1 Negative controls were run concurrently. Thirty percent of CSF macrophages showed positive staining consistent with the presence of intracytoplasmic FCoV antigen within these cells ( Figure 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%