2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13030-017-0114-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and challenges of palliative care in Indonesia: role of psychosomatic medicine

Abstract: Purpose of reviewTo summarize the current status of palliative care and the role of psychosomatic medicine in Indonesia.Recent findingsPalliative care is not a new issue in Indonesia, which has been improving palliative care since 1992 and developed a palliative care policy in 2007 that was launched by the Indonesian Ministry of Health. However, the progress has been slow and varied across the country. Currently, palliative care services are only available in a few major cities, where most of the facilities fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the difficulty index, Items 5,19,7,3, and 11 were indicated as very difficult (difficulty index <0.20), and Item 18 was indicated as very easy (difficulty index >0.80) among all participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding the difficulty index, Items 5,19,7,3, and 11 were indicated as very difficult (difficulty index <0.20), and Item 18 was indicated as very easy (difficulty index >0.80) among all participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As shown in Table 4, Item 5 "It is crucial for family members to remain at the bedside until death occurs (False)" and Item 19 "The loss of a distant or contentious relationship is easier to resolve than the loss of one that is close or intimate (False)" were answered correctly by the lowest percentage of participants (5.3%, n = 8). Table 4 also shows that Item 18 was very easy (difficulty index >0.80), whereas Items 5,19,7,3, and 11 were very difficult (difficulty index 0.04-0.15). Items 5 and 19 were indicated as poor (discrimination index <0.10).…”
Section: Overall Responsesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations