Development and evaluation of a clinical model for lung cancer patients using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) within a knowledge‐based algorithm for treatment planning

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the development of a clinical model for lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) within a knowledge‐based algorithm for treatment planning, and to evaluate the model performance and applicability to different planning techniques, tumor locations, and beam arrangements. 105 SBRT plans for lung cancer patients previously treated at our institution were included in the development of the knowledge‐based model (KBM). The KBM was trained with a combination of IMRT, VMAT, and 3D CRT techniques. Model performance was validated with 25 cases, for both IMRT and VMAT. The full KBM encompassed lesions located centrally vs. peripherally (43:62), upper vs. lower (62:43), and anterior vs. posterior (60:45). Four separate sub‐KBMs were created based on tumor location. Results were compared with the full KBM to evaluate its robustness. Beam templates were used in conjunction with the optimizer to evaluate the model's ability to handle suboptimal beam placements. Dose differences to organs‐at‐risk (OAR) were evaluated between the plans generated by each KBM. Knowledge‐based plans (KBPs) were comparable to clinical plans with respect to target conformity and OAR doses. The KBPs resulted in a lower maximum spinal cord dose by 1.0±1.6Gy compared to clinical plans, p=0.007. Sub‐KBMs split according to tumor location did not produce significantly better DVH estimates compared to the full KBM. For central lesions, compared to the full KBM, the peripheral sub‐KBM resulted in lower dose to 0.035 cc and 5 cc of the esophagus, both by 0.4Gy±0.8Gy, p=0.025. For all lesions, compared to the full KBM, the posterior sub‐KBM resulted in higher dose to 0.035 cc, 0.35 cc, and 1.2 cc of the spinal cord by 0.2±0.4Gy, p=0.01. Plans using template beam arrangements met target and OAR criteria, with an increase noted in maximum heart dose (1.2±2.2Gy, p=0.01) and GI (0.2±0.4, p=0.01) for the nine‐field plans relative to KBPs planned with custom beam angles. A knowledge‐based model for lung SBRT consisting of multiple treatment modalities and lesion locations produced comparable plan quality to clinical plans. With proper training and validation, a robust KBM can be created that encompasses both IMRT and VMAT techniques, as well as different lesion locations.PACS number(s): 87.55de, 87.55kh, 87.53Ly

Assessment of specific versus combined purpose knowledge based models in prostate radiotherapy

“…KBP library models are a good way to incorporate the expert knowledge base found from prior patient planning and rapidly utilize this knowledge to predict planning outcomes for new patients. Many groups have utilized in‐house created models applied to a variety of body sites . Most have started with prostate planning due to the simplicity of the site in terms of ease of planning and the bonus of having a database that includes a large number of consistent plans from which to draw.…”

Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning—a review of recent innovations

“…Reports have been published for head and neck cancer, 72,79,82 prostate cancer, 62,66,78,83,188 cervical cancer, 78 lung cancer, 75,83,189 spinal metastasis, 63 breast cancer, 65 upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, 61,70,76 and lower GI cancers. 190 Foy et al reported that KBP could reduce the VMAT planning of stereotactic body radiotherapy of the spine from 1-1.5 h to around 10-15 min.…”

A method of using deep learning to predict three‐dimensional dose distributions for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy of rectal cancer

“…Researchers have devoted a considerable amount of efforts in achievement the dose prediction as part of the treatment planning process. The most widely reported approach is the so‐called knowledge‐based planning (KBP) which builds a geometry‐dosimetry correlation prediction model based on prior patient databases of high‐quality treatment plans8‐19 and this approach is currently available in the commercial software, RapidPlan (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) 20. These KBP methods have been shown to improve the plan quality, consistency, and efficiency.…”