Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test

Zokoll, Melanie A.; Fidan, Dilek; Türkyılmaz, Meral Didem; Hochmuth, Sabine; Ergenç, İclâl; Sennaroğlu, Gonca; Kollmeier, Birger

doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1074735

Cited by 54 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Его также называют Ольденбургским фразо-вым тестом (Oldenburger Satztest, OLSA). На настоящий момент существует 18 версий данного теста для разных языков, из которых 9 доступно для клинического исполь-зования [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. С 2012 г. начались испытания русской версии матриксного фразового теста (Russian matrix sentence test), которая получила сокращенное название RuMatrix Test.…”

Section: оригинальные статьиunclassified

The speech audiometry using the matrix sentence test

Boboshko

Zhilinskaia

Warzybok

et al. 2016

Vestn. otorinolaringol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

1 лаборатория слуха и речи (зав. -д.м.н. м.Ю. бобошко) Первого санкт-Петербургского государственного медицинского университета им. акад. и.П. Павлова» минздрава россии, санкт-Петербург, россия, 197022; 2 Группа медицинской физики и высокотехнологичный кластер по улучшению слуха (руководитель -проф. б. Кольмейер) в университете Карла фон оссиецки ольденбурга, ольденбург, Германия, 26129Матриксный тест, предполагающий использование в качестве речевого материала семантически непредсказуемых фраз из 5 слов на фоне шума, разработан и апробирован для многих языков. Цель исследования -апробация русской версии матриксного фразового теста (RuMatrix Test) Принятые сокращения: дБ нПС -децибел относительно нормального порога слышимости дБ УЗД -децибел относительно исходного уровня звуко-вого давления RuMatrix -Russian matrix sentence test -русский матрикс-ный фразовый тест SNR -Signal-to-Noise Ratio -отношение сигнал/шум SRT -Speech reception threshold -порог речевой разборчи-вости SRT 5 -отношение сигнал/шум, при котором достигается уровень 50% речевой разборчивости ОРигинаЛьные статьи

show abstract

Section: оригинальные статьиunclassified

The speech audiometry using the matrix sentence test

Boboshko

Zhilinskaia

Warzybok

et al. 2016

Vestn. otorinolaringol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However there is a correlation between the Non-adaptive Intelligibility Score in Quiet and the Adaptive Matrix SRT in Quiet values (p<0.05). Similarly, Zokoll et al (11) did not report any significant correlation between SRT in quiet (dB SPL) and adaptive SRT in noise (dB SNR).…”

Section: Comparison Between Normal Hearing Subjects and CI Usersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although a similar study for Turkish CI users could not be found, Zokoll et al (11) measured the intelligibility scores at fixed SNRs in normal hearing subjects using the Turkish Matrix test. Then they calculated the mean SRT value of subjects and found that the subjects has a speech intelligibility score of 50% at -8.3 +/-0.2 dB SNR.…”

Section: Comparison Between Normal Hearing Subjects and CI Usersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…33, No. 5,2016 ported in the literature show that it has better efficiency in testing hearing performance in noise (11). It could be concluded that the Matrix Test can be used to assess the benefits that CI us ers gain from their systems in everyday life, since with the Matrix test it is possible to perform intelligibility tests with a material that CI users use in their everyday life and it is possible to assess their difficulty in speech discrimination in noisy conditions which they have to cope.…”

Section: Comparison Between Normal Hearing Subjects and CI Usersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Turkish version of the test was first introduced by Zokoll et al (9) and it is present today for a number of other languages (German, Danish, British English, Polish, French, Russian, Spanish, American English, Dutch) including Turkish (10). The Turkish version of the Matrix test was normalized and used for the assessment of speech intelligibility of normal hearing Turkish subjects by Zokoll et al (11).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Assessment of the Speech Intelligibility Performance of Post Lingual Cochlear Implant Users at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios Using the Turkish Matrix Test

Polat¹,

Bulut²,

Ataş³

2016

Balkan Med J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Spoken word recognition and speech perception tests in quiet are being used as a routine in assessment of the benefit which children and adult cochlear implant users receive from their devices.Cochlear implant users generally demonstrate high level performances in these test materials as they are able to achieve high level speech perception ability in quiet situations. Although these test materials provide valuable information regarding Cochlear Implant (CI) users' performances in optimal listening conditions, they do not give realistic information regarding performances in adverse listening conditions, which is the case in the everyday environment. Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the speech intelligibility performance of post lingual CI users in the presence of noise at different signal-to-noise ratio with the Matrix Test developed for Turkish language. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The thirty post lingual implant user adult subjects, who had been using implants for a minimum of one year, were evaluated with Turkish Matrix test. Subjects' speech intelligibility was measured using the adaptive and non-adaptive Matrix Test in quiet and noisy environments.

show abstract

Investigating Sensitivity to Auditory Cognition in Listening Effort Assessments: A Simultaneous EEG and Pupillometry Study

Kılıç,

Sendesen,

Aslan

et al. 2024

Brain and Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundIt is still not fully explained what kind of cognitive sources the methods used in the assessment of listening effort are more sensitive to and how these measurement results are related to each other. The aim of the study is to ascertain which neural resources crucial for listening effort are most sensitive to objective measurement methods using differently degraded speech stimuli.MethodsA total of 49 individuals between the ages of 19 and 34 with normal hearing participated in the study. In the first stage, simultaneous pupillometry, electroencephalogram (EEG), and single‐task paradigm reaction time (RT) measurements were made during the challenging listening and repetition task with noise‐vocoded speech. Two speech reception thresholds (SRT) (50% and 80%) for two vocoding conditions (16 and 6 channels) were collected, resulting in 4 conditions. In the second stage, the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) and the test of attention in listening (TAIL) were applied. Stepwise linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the predictors of listening effort measurements.ResultsA significant difference was found between 6 and 16 channel stimuli in both pupil dilation change and EEG alpha band power change. In the hardest listening condition, whereas RAVLT scores are significant predictors of pupil dilation change, TAIL scores are significant predictors of EEG alpha power. As the stimulus difficulty decreased, the factors that predicted both EEG and pupillometry results decreased. In the single‐task paradigm, a significant regression model could not be obtained at all four difficulty levels.ConclusionAs a result of the study, it was found that the pupil dilation change was more sensitive to auditory memory skills and the EEG alpha power change was more sensitive to auditory attention skills. To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the sensitivity of different listening effort measurement methods to auditory cognitive skills.

show abstract

Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test

Abstract: The TURMatrix was developed according to European standards and provides reliable speech intelligibility measurements in noise and quiet.

Cited by 54 publications

References 23 publications

The speech audiometry using the matrix sentence test

The speech audiometry using the matrix sentence test

Assessment of the Speech Intelligibility Performance of Post Lingual Cochlear Implant Users at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios Using the Turkish Matrix Test

Investigating Sensitivity to Auditory Cognition in Listening Effort Assessments: A Simultaneous EEG and Pupillometry Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About