Development and performance evaluation of automatic plum seed remover

Ali, Mohammod; Cha, Jaeyoon; Park, Seong-Jin; Akhter, Tangina; Kim, Gwang-Shim; Yang, Kyu-Won; Seonwoo, Hoon; Kim, Hyuck-Joo

doi:10.1016/j.eaef.2019.02.001

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Plum is a very important and healthy fruit that can be consumed in fresh and processed forms such as jellies, jams, dried products [4]. Mature plum contains about 84-90% (w/w) flesh and the pit (stone) with the kernel is the remaining 10-16% (w/w) [5]. The processing of plums results in the production of pits that should be removed from the fruit.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is well-documented that a plant cultivar can distinguish itself from other variants due to the inherent physicochemical properties formed and recorded during its growth [5,6]. Conventionally, the discrimination of plant cultivars is dependent on the phenotypic and genotypic traits such as morphological forms, pomological structure, fruit shape, and appearance, plant physiological indices, genetic information, etc.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Benchmarking Machine Learning Approaches to Evaluate the Cultivar Differentiation of Plum (Prunus domestica L.) Kernels

Ropelewska

Cai

Zhan³

et al. 2022

Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Plum fruit and kernels offer bioactive material for industrial production. The promising procedure for distinguishing plum kernel cultivars used in this study comprised two stages: image analysis to compute the texture parameters of plum kernels belonging to three cultivars ‘Emper’, ‘Kalipso’, and ‘Polinka’, and discriminant analysis using machine learning algorithms to classify plum kernel cultivars based on selected textures with the highest discriminative power. The discriminative models built separately for sets of textures selected from all color channels L, a, b, R, G, B, U, V, S, X, Y, Z, color space Lab and color channel b using the KStar (Lazy), PART (Rules), and LMT (Trees) classifiers provided the highest average accuracies reaching 98% in the case of the color space Lab and the KStar classifier. In this case, individual cultivars were discriminated with the accuracies of 97% for ‘Emper’ and ‘Kalipso’ to 99% for ‘Polinka’. The values of other performance metrics were also satisfactory, higher than 0.95. The ROC curves were quite smooth and steady with the most satisfactory curve for the ‘Kalipso’ kernels. The present study sheds light on an objective, non-destructive, and inexpensive procedure for cultivar discrimination of plum kernels.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%