Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Transsexual Voice Questionnaire for Male-to-Female Transsexuals

Dacakis, Georgia; Davies, Shelagh; Oates, Jennifer; Douglas, Jacinta; Johnston, Judith R.

doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.11.005

Cited by 141 publications

(107 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The high levels of internal consistency obtained in this study in both test (α=0.911) and retest (α=0.952) were similar to the results obtained in the study by Dacakis et al (10) , in which the coefficients obtained were α=0.964 for the test and α=0.974 for the retest.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…Although the sentence "My voice sounds artificial" (Item 14) presented an ITC lower than 0.20 (ITC=0.152) in the test, there was agreement on the degree of homogeneity obtained by Dacakis et al (10) . The analysis of the TVQ: MTF (original version) did not reveal any item considered poor/weak in the test (0.39-0.85) or in the retest (similar amplitude to test).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

“…The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated using the same procedures suggested by Dacakis et al (10) . The participants were asked to complete the questionnaire and demographic form (TVQ:…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, the review led to the development of two versions, one for MTF transsexuals and one for FTM transsexuals, entitled Transsexual Voice Questionnaire: Male-toFemale (TVQ: MtF ) and Transsexual Voice Questionnaire: Female-to-Male (TVQ: FtM ), respectively. A study by Dacakis et al (10) on the psychometric properties of the TVQ: MtF with 29 Australian and 6 Canadian participants showed high internal consistency and excellent reliability.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…More recently, in 2006, a specific self-assessment scale for use with transsexual patients was developed by Dacakis et al (10) based on the Voice Handicap Index (VHI): the Transgender Self-Assessment Questionnaire (TSEQ). Just as the VHI, the TSEQ also has 30 items.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Translation and preliminary evaluation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Transgender Voice Questionnaire for male-to-female transsexuals

Santos

Aguiar

Baeck

et al. 2015

CoDAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Translation and preliminary evaluation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Transgender Voice Questionnaire for male-to-female transsexuals

Santos

Aguiar

Baeck

et al. 2015

CoDAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Most-Cited Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Within Otolaryngology—Revisiting the Minimal Clinically Important Difference

Peterson

Miller

Ioerger

et al. 2023

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ImportancePatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) allow clinicians and researchers to assess health-related information from a patient’s perspective. These measures have been used more frequently over the last several decades, but an associated minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is needed to optimize their utility. This narrative review identified the top 100 most-cited otolaryngology-related PROM development and validation publications and assessed the presence and characteristics of the PROMs’ associated MCID.ObservationsIn this narrative review, a literature search in Scopus and Web of Science was conducted on June 29, 2022, using keywords related to PROM development and validation studies in otolaryngology and reference lists. Studies that met the definition of a PROM and assessed an otolaryngologic disorder or study population were included for full-text review. After full-text review of 188 articles, the top 100 most-cited PROM development and validation publications, resulting in 106 total PROMs, were chosen for review. A total of 39 (37%) of the identified PROMs had an associated MCID. Of those reporting an MCID, 14 (35.9%) used an anchor-based method, 12 (30.8%) used a distribution-based method, 10 (25.6%) used both, and 3 (7.7%) did not specify or used neither method. Rhinology had the greatest number of PROMs with an associated MCID (16 of 24, 66%), and pediatrics had the fewest (1 of 13, 7.7%). The median number of citations of PROMs with an MCID was higher than those without an MCID.Conclusions and RelevanceThe majority of the most-cited PROMs in otolaryngology lack an associated MCID. These data indicated that there are a multitude of PROMs that have been cited hundreds of times and used for decades without the ability to identify whether a particular change in score on the instrument is clinically meaningful. There is a need to determine and validate MCIDs for commonly used PROMs to aid clinical research and trial interpretation.

show abstract

Describing, Assessing, and Treating Voice Disorders

Morris

Harmon

2021

The Handbook of Language and Speech Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Transsexual Voice Questionnaire for Male-to-Female Transsexuals

Cited by 141 publications

References 17 publications

Translation and preliminary evaluation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Transgender Voice Questionnaire for male-to-female transsexuals

Translation and preliminary evaluation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Transgender Voice Questionnaire for male-to-female transsexuals

Most-Cited Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Within Otolaryngology—Revisiting the Minimal Clinically Important Difference

Describing, Assessing, and Treating Voice Disorders

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About