2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.101569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and preliminary validation of the Communal Coping Strategies Inventory for Competitive Team Sports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a definitional approach (Ptacek, Smith, Espe, & Raffety, 1994), the Communal Coping Strategies Inventory for Competitive Team Sports (Leprince et al, 2019) was adapted to measure four communal coping dimensions: problem‐oriented communal efforts (problem solving, increasing efforts), communal management of emotions (reassurance, interpersonal regulation of negative emotions), communal goal withdrawal (venting emotions, disengagement), and relationship‐oriented coping (motivational support, social joining). Participants reported to what extent they (themselves and their training partners or teammates) currently used communal coping to manage the impact of the COVID‐19 situation together, on a 6‐point Likert scale ranging from 0 ( not at all ) to 5 ( very strongly ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using a definitional approach (Ptacek, Smith, Espe, & Raffety, 1994), the Communal Coping Strategies Inventory for Competitive Team Sports (Leprince et al, 2019) was adapted to measure four communal coping dimensions: problem‐oriented communal efforts (problem solving, increasing efforts), communal management of emotions (reassurance, interpersonal regulation of negative emotions), communal goal withdrawal (venting emotions, disengagement), and relationship‐oriented coping (motivational support, social joining). Participants reported to what extent they (themselves and their training partners or teammates) currently used communal coping to manage the impact of the COVID‐19 situation together, on a 6‐point Likert scale ranging from 0 ( not at all ) to 5 ( very strongly ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It describes the way people jointly engage in collective efforts and cooperative actions to manage stressful circumstances (e.g. communal coping; Leprince, d'Arripe-Longueville, Chanal, & Doron, 2019;Lyons et al, 1998;or dyadic coping;Staff, Didymus, & Backhouse, 2020). In order to appropriately differentiate communal or dyadic coping from other forms of social support, researchers have recently proposed that social support be viewed as the unidirectional provision of support, and dyadic or communal coping as bidirectional support within interpersonal relationships (Staff et al, 2017(Staff et al, , 2020.…”
Section: Coping With An Unprecedented Stressful Situationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the detection algorithm of deep learning, the Faster RCNN algorithm is further optimized on the basis of the RCNN algorithm [23]. RCNN uses boxes, while Faster [24].…”
Section: Sports Image Segmentation Methods Based On Fuzzymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Communal Coping Strategies Inventory for Competitive Team Sports 30 was used to measure four dimensions of interpersonal coping: (1) problem‐focused communal efforts (i.e., logical analysis, problem solving, increasing efforts, and focusing); (2) relationship‐focused coping (i.e., motivational support, compensation, and social joining strategies); (3) communal management of emotions (i.e., reassurance and interpersonal regulation of negative emotions); (4) communal goal withdrawal (i.e., venting of emotions and disengagement). Participants were asked to indicate on a 5‐point Likert scale the extent to which they and their team used each of the interpersonal coping strategies when facing stressful situations in competition (1 = never used; 5 = frequently used).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%