Development and study of a portable plasma focus neutron source

Vinogradov, V. P.; Nashilevskii, A. V.; Krauz, V. I.; Ремнев, Г. Е.; Vinogradova, Yu. V.; Kanaev, G. G.; Mitrofanov, K. N.; Myalton, V. V.

doi:10.1134/s1063780x1402007x

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The effect of the formation of closed current formations was observed in experiments on a small installation (W = 540-600 J, Imax = 75 kA) [426] (see Figure 114).…”

Section: Pf-3mentioning

confidence: 80%

“…. The effect of the formation of closed current formations was observed in experiments on a small installation (W = 540-600 J, Imax = 75 kA) [426] (see Figure 114). Sometime after PCS compression on the axis (the dip in the current time derivative), the current measured by the probes becomes oppositely directed to the total current.…”

Section: Pf-3mentioning

confidence: 80%

“…Reproduced with permission from Figure 11 of [206] Plasma Physics Reports, 2010, 36, 937-952. © 2021 Pleiades Publishing Ltd.The effect of the formation of closed current formations was observed in experiments on a small installation (W = 540-600 J, Imax = 75 kA)[426] (see Figure114).…”

mentioning

confidence: 88%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Update on the Scientific Status of the Plasma Focus

Auluck

Kubeš

Paduch

et al. 2021

Plasma

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper is a sequel to the 1998 review paper “Scientific status of the Dense Plasma Focus” with 16 authors belonging to 16 nations, whose initiative led to the establishment of the International Center for Dense Magnetized Plasmas (ICDMP) in the year 2000. Its focus is on understanding the principal defining characteristic features of the plasma focus in the light of the developments that have taken place in the last 20 years, in terms of new facilities, diagnostics, models, and insights. Although it is too soon to proclaim with certainty what the plasma focus phenomenon is, the results available to date conclusively indicate what it is demonstrably not. The review looks at the experimental data, cross-correlated across multiple diagnostics and multiple devices, to delineate the contours of an emerging narrative that is fascinatingly different from the standard narrative, which has guided the consensus in the plasma focus community for several decades, without invalidating it. It raises a question mark over the Fundamental Premise of Controlled Fusion Research, namely, that any fusion reaction having the character of a beam-target process must necessarily be more inefficient than a thermonuclear process with a confined thermal plasma at a suitably high temperature. Open questions that need attention of researchers are highlighted. A future course of action is suggested that individual plasma focus laboratories could adopt in order to positively influence the future growth of research in this field, to the general benefit of not only the controlled fusion research community but also the world at large.

show abstract

“…The effect of the formation of closed current formations was observed in experiments on a small installation (W = 540-600 J, Imax = 75 kA) [426] (see Figure 114).…”

Section: Pf-3mentioning

confidence: 80%

Section: Pf-3mentioning

confidence: 80%