Development and Validation of a Circumplex Measure of the Interpersonal Culture in Work Teams and Organizations

Locke, Kenneth D.

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00850

Cited by 14 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To investigate the integrity of the underlying circumplex model of PAQ [30], tests of circumplexity based on correlations via the randomized test of hypothesized order relations (RTHOR) and sinusoidality are employed [75,76]. To form a circumplex model, the intercorrelations between variables must conform to a minimum criteria [75,76].…”

Section: Integrity Of the Circumplex Model For Perceived Affective Qu...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the perceived indoor acoustic environment quality across building occupants in a tertiary-care public hospital in Singapore

Lam¹,

Fan²,

Ooi³

et al. 2022

Building and Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Integrity Of the Circumplex Model For Perceived Affective Qu...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the perceived indoor acoustic environment quality across building occupants in a tertiary-care public hospital in Singapore

Lam¹,

Fan²,

Ooi³

et al. 2022

Building and Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The vertical axis signifies Status, Dominance, Power, Ambitiousness where as horizontal axis meant for Agreeableness, Compassion, Solidarity, Friendliness, Warmth, Love. This interpersonal circumplex can be divided into two or four broad segments, or sixteen narrow segments [25], [26] shown in Figure 2(a). But most of the studies considered the circle into eight partitions/octants which implies a blend of the two axial dimensions.…”

Section: Interpersonal Circumflex Data Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Correlation based data unification for personality trait prediction

Divi

Potala

2022

IJEECS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<span>The data points created by users with their online behavior are the primary source of data analysis in various research studies. One of such studies that even more contributes directly or indirectly to other application domains is personality trait analysis. There are well-defined models witnessed to be strong enough to characterize the individual personalities. Some prominent models are the Big Five, Interpersonal Circumplex, and DISC. To make it possible the model should always be fed with a huge amount of data. Here comes the limitation is that the user's online behavior is spread across various platforms resulting in various forms of data points. The segregated form of the data limits the model performance, which is the primary focus of the proposed work. Among these, the big five personality traits model has become so familiar because of its simplicity and dominance. The proposed work illustrated the mapping of various data forms namely measures of the source dataset (MBTI) and Interpersonal Circumplex data to Big five data.</span>

show abstract

“…Centiment relies upon a diverse panel of participants who are periodically sent surveys on varied topics. Centiment has been used by scholars in a wide array of fields (see, for example, Venetis, Chernichky‐Karcher, and Lillie, 2020; Scaptura and Boyle, 2019; Locke, 2019) because of the diversity and quality of their respondent pool. Centiment also uses screening questions embedded in the survey to ensure that respondents are attending to the questions being asked and not merely clicking on answers.…”

Section: The Mismatch Effectmentioning

confidence: 99%

Are Individuals Harmed by Gerrymandering? Examining Access to Congressional District Offices

Niven

Cover

Solimine

2020

Social Science Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective We consider proximity and access to the district offices of members of Congress to explore whether gerrymandering affects individuals’ capacity to be heard and thus impairs their representation. Methods In a study of six states, we conduct more than 123 million distance measurements to identify residents whose closest district office is in the wrong congressional district. Based on survey results, we then estimate the likelihood that such mismatched individuals will personally visit the office of their member of Congress. Results We find that in five gerrymandered states, between 28.7 and 47.5 percent of residents have a mismatched closest district office, a rate several times higher than in a non‐gerrymandered state. Extrapolating from survey results, we find that mismatched residents are 38 percent less likely to visit their own district office, and that across five states gerrymandering effectively deters nearly 600,000 office visits over a two‐year congressional session. Conclusion Of significance in both the legal and scholarly arena, we find that gerrymandering increases the prevalence of mismatched district offices, thereby impeding constituents from making in‐person visits that are widely viewed as the most effective mechanism for communicating their opinions and needs to Congress. We believe this heretofore undocumented mismatch warrants additional scholarly consideration of gerrymandering's effects on individual's access to tangible aspects of representation.

show abstract

Development and Validation of a Circumplex Measure of the Interpersonal Culture in Work Teams and Organizations

Cited by 14 publications

References 50 publications

Assessing the perceived indoor acoustic environment quality across building occupants in a tertiary-care public hospital in Singapore

Assessing the perceived indoor acoustic environment quality across building occupants in a tertiary-care public hospital in Singapore

Correlation based data unification for personality trait prediction

Are Individuals Harmed by Gerrymandering? Examining Access to Congressional District Offices

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About