Development and validation of a scale to measure health-related socioeconomic well-being in persons with a cancer diagnosis.

Head, Barbara

doi:10.18297/etd/594

Cited by 1 publication

(5 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…After duplications were removed, a total of 11 731 articles were retained, 11 669 articles were deleted after reading the title and abstract, and 39 were deleted after full-text reading. Finally, a total of 23 articles (21 PROMs) were eligible for inclusion in this study 12 14 16 23–42…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All included studies were published from 2005 to 2022. Eight studies were conducted in the USA,12 14 23 27 30 37 39 41 four in the UK,16 29 35 38 two in Canada31 36 and two in China (mainland and Hong Kong),25 39 India26 34 and Italy 33 42. One study was conducted in 12 countries in Europe and North America 22 23.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the 21 PROMs, 7 were FT-related domains of quality of life PROMs and 14 were independent PROMs focusing on FT. All PROMs were validated in cancer survivors. Fifteen PROMs were in English,12 14 16 23 25–31 35 37 38 40–42 and two were in Chinese 24 39. Other languages included French,36 Portuguese,32 Italian,33 42 Hindi25 26 and Persian 34.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Eight PROMs were rated as ‘+’” in reliability 12 24 26–29 31 35. Ten PROMs were rated as ‘+’ in hypothesis testing 12 14 23 24 27–31 33 35 39. Limited information was retrieved on cross-cultural validity (two PROMs),32 36 criterion validity (six PROMs),16 24 33 35 38 40 and responsiveness (two PROMs) 31 39.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Tucker-Seeley and colleagues developed a conceptual model of FT and emphasised three components of financial burden, namely, the material, psychosocial and behavioural domains 47. Head developed SWBS based on James Coleman’s Theory of Social Class; this scale contains 17 items across 3 domains: human capital, material capital and social capital 14 30 48. Witte et al ’s systematic review analysed 352 different questions regarding financial spending and found six domains (financial spending, financial resources, psychosocial affect, support seeking, coping care and coping lifestyle) that can represent reactions to subjective financial distress 10.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Psychometric properties of self-reported financial toxicity measures in cancer survivors: a systematic review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThe aim of this systematic review was to summarise the psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) measuring financial toxicity (FT) in cancer survivors.DesignThis systematic review was conducted according to the guidance of the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology.Data sourcesComprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, ProQuest and Cochrane Library from database inception to February 2022.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesWe included studies that reported any PROMs for measuring FT in cancer survivors who were ≥18 years old. FT was defined as perceived subjective financial distress resulting from objective financial burden. Studies that were not validation studies and that used a PROM only as an outcome measurement were excluded.Data extraction and synthesisTwo reviewers independently extracted data from the included papers. We used the COSMIN criteria to summarise and evaluate the psychometric properties of each study regarding structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, hypothesis testing for construct validity, cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance, criterion validity and responsiveness.ResultsA total of 23 articles (21 PROMs) were eligible for inclusion in this study. The findings highlighted that the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) had an adequate development process and showed better psychometric properties than other PROMs, especially in internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.92), reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.80) and hypothesis testing (r=0.42–0.20).ConclusionsFrom a psychometric property perspective, the COST could be recommended as the most suitable worldwide available measure for use in research and clinical practice across different contexts. We suggest that PROMs should be selected only after careful consideration of the local socioeconomic context. Future studies are warranted to develop various FT PROMs based on different social and cultural backgrounds and to clarify the theoretical grounds for assessing FT.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%