2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a systematic approach for the quantitative assessment of the quality of duct tape physical fits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ESS thresholds were provided in the template as an additional measure of similarity based on previous research: ESS less than 40 indicated the edge comparison was considered a non-fit, an ESS of 40-60 was considered inconclusive, and an ESS of 60 or higher was considered a fit. ESS below 30 or above 80 were considered to provide stronger support for a non-fit or fit conclusion, respectively [13][14][15]. A template was filled out for every pairwise comparison of tape samples.…”
Section: Standardized Reporting Templatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…ESS thresholds were provided in the template as an additional measure of similarity based on previous research: ESS less than 40 indicated the edge comparison was considered a non-fit, an ESS of 40-60 was considered inconclusive, and an ESS of 60 or higher was considered a fit. ESS below 30 or above 80 were considered to provide stronger support for a non-fit or fit conclusion, respectively [13][14][15]. A template was filled out for every pairwise comparison of tape samples.…”
Section: Standardized Reporting Templatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among those publications, the most common materials include metal, tapes, textiles (including ropes and cords), glass, ceramics, polymers, and paper [6][7][8][9]. To address the need to demonstrate the scientific validity of physical fit comparisons, recent studies have included larger datasets to estimate error rates for physical fit comparisons and critical factors for the quality of a physical fit [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Elemental analysis is typically conducted by μXRF, ICP-MS, ICP-OES, or LA-ICP-MS Although a fracture fit is considered the highest degree of association between two objects, its scientific validity needs further proof. As a result, evaluating the scientific foundations of fracture fits and fracture patterns of trace materials has regained interest in the last 5 years (Baca et al, 2016;Brooks et al, 2020;Prusinowski et al, 2020).…”
Section: Current Practice and Analytical Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2020, Prusinowski et al developed a systematic method to quantify the quality of a duct tape physical fit using a similarity score named Edge Similarity Score (ESS) [ 131 ]. The ESS uses the duct tape scrim bins as the smallest comparison unit in a reproducible manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%