2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a risk calculator for post-discharge venous thromboembolism following hepatectomy for malignancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study suggests that risk-based deescalation may be warranted for certain urological operations, specifically those involving the prostate or kidney that have short lengths of hospital stay and high utilization of minimally invasive surgery. This study also supports further development of VTE risk calculators that are both population-specific and procedure site–specific to guide chemoprophylaxis use …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This study suggests that risk-based deescalation may be warranted for certain urological operations, specifically those involving the prostate or kidney that have short lengths of hospital stay and high utilization of minimally invasive surgery. This study also supports further development of VTE risk calculators that are both population-specific and procedure site–specific to guide chemoprophylaxis use …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Despite variation by specialty with regard to inpatient VTE chemoprophylaxis ordering, rates of VTE in the VHA were similar to those in other non-VHA health systems. 17 , 22 , 24 , 25 , 26 Inpatient VTE chemoprophylaxis administration is a multilevel process with many areas for potential failure, but we found that rates of ordering (80.4%) were concordant with rates of documented administration (99.5%), which indicates a comparably high level of performance at VHA hospitals. 14 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations