2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of a New Tool for the Assessment and Spiritual Care of Palliative Care Patients

Abstract: The new questionnaire, based on empirical research and bedside experience, showed good psychometric properties and clinical applicability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0
13

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
57
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been especially true in the field of palliative care. [7][8][9] Data indicate that a focus on spirituality improves patients' health outcomes, including quality of life. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Conversely, negative spiritual and religious beliefs can cause distress and increase the burdens of illness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been especially true in the field of palliative care. [7][8][9] Data indicate that a focus on spirituality improves patients' health outcomes, including quality of life. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Conversely, negative spiritual and religious beliefs can cause distress and increase the burdens of illness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some tools available to identify existential distress in such patients (Newell et al, 2002;Alesi et al, 2015;Benito et al, 2014). In recent years, new psychological interventions have been put forward for these patients, including methods of seeking meaning and reinforcing the patient's sense of dignity (Chochinov et al, 2002b;Breitbart et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors emphasize the patient's spiritual needs such as hope, sense, love, religious or divine inclinations, and coping with death (Benito et al, 2014, Galek, Flannelly, Vane & Galek, 2005, Nixon & Narayanasamy, 2010Yong et al, 2008); with the very low percentages documented in this study, the long journey that remains for GPC compliance is inferred. According to the results, there is no evidence to show that our results are consistent with the recommendation of Buzzi et al (2009), which includes the psychological and spiritual aspects of the patient's treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%