2020
DOI: 10.29252/aassjournal.809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of a Tool for Assessing Barriers to Participation in Team Sports for Women with Physical-Mobility Disabilities

Abstract: Background. Creating proper contexts to maximize sport participation of women with physical-mobility disabilities requires identifying barriers to their participation. It is essential to develop a valid and reliable tool to identify existing barriers. Objectives. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a questionnaire for assessing barriers to participation in team sports for women with physical-mobility disabilities. Methods. The data were collected through theoretical literature, observation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A society that does not recognize and value people with functional diversity loses all the potential they have to offer [ 76 ]. Other barriers identified as differentiating factors were culture and media [ 17 ], but in this research, they were far less represented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A society that does not recognize and value people with functional diversity loses all the potential they have to offer [ 76 ]. Other barriers identified as differentiating factors were culture and media [ 17 ], but in this research, they were far less represented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…All the selected articles had to identify a study outcome that referred specifically to women. These outcomes were grouped according to the type of outcome, corresponding to a differentiating factors which were as a result of an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) that explained 56.5% of the total variance: personal, physical, psychological, leadership, media support, coaching role, economic, others’ attitudes, social, and cultural/religious support [ 17 ]. The barriers identified in each study were categorized and unified according to each grouping factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation