Development and validation of a chewing function questionnaire for Chinese older adults

Fan, Yanpin; Shu, Xin; Lo, Edward Chin Man; Leung, Kcm

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103520

Cited by 9 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Regarding PROM development, six studies described the development process and the methodological qualities of all these studies were rated as doubtful [ 30 , 31 , 35 , 38 , 41 , 44 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… + ? 0 0 – 0 0 CFQ-Japanese [ 36 ] + – 0 + 0 – 0 0 CFQ-Chinese [ 30 ] + + ? + 0 + 0 0 FIAQ [ 37 ] 0 0 0 ?…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Perceived Difficulty of Chewing-Tanzania (PDC-Tanzania) had moderate level of evidence for sufficient hypothesis testing for construct validity and low level of evidence for indeterminate internal consistency [ 34 ]. Chewing Function Questionnaire-Chinese (CFQ-Chinese) had high level of evidence for internal consistency, and moderate level of evidence for test–retest reliability, structural validity and hypothesis testing for construct validity, and these psychometric properties were all rated as sufficient [ 30 ]. Screening for Masticatory Disorders in Older Adults (SMDOA) had high level of evidence for structural validity and hypothesis testing for construct validity, and low level of evidence for content validity, and these psychometric properties were all rated as sufficient [ 41 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… + ? 0 0 − 0 0 Level of evidence Low Low Low Moderate CFQ-Japanese [ 36 ] + − 0 + 0 − 0 0 Level of evidence Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate CFQ-Chinese [ 30 ] + + ? + 0 + 0 0 Level of evidence Moderate Moderate Very low Moderate Moderate FIAQ [ 37 ] 0 0 0 ?…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the present review, only six studies described the PROM development process and this was only briefly presented [ 30 , 31 , 35 , 38 , 41 , 44 ]. It is hard to tell whether the PROM development process had not been properly carried out or was just not reported.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The aim of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for masticatory function in adults. Methods Five electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL Plus and APA PsycINFO) were searched up to March 2021. Studies reporting development or validation of PROMs for masticatory function on adults were identified. Methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) risk of bias checklist. Psychometric properties of the PROM in each included study were rated against the criteria for good measurement properties based on the COSMIN guideline. Results Twenty-three studies investigating 19 PROMs were included. Methodological qualities of these studies were diverse. Four types of PROMs were identified: questions using food items to assess masticatory function (13 PROMs), questions on chewing problems (3 PROMs), questions using both food items and chewing problems (2 PROMs) and a global question (1 PROM). Only a few of these PROMs, namely chewing function questionnaire-Chinese, Croatian or Albanian, food intake questionnaire-Japanese, new food intake questionnaire-Japanese, screening for masticatory disorders in older adults and perceived difficulty of chewing-Tanzania demonstrated high or moderate level of evidence in several psychometric properties. Conclusions Currently, there is no PROM for masticatory function in adults with high-level evidence for all psychometric properties. There are variations in the psychometric properties among the different reported PROMs. Trial Registration PROSPERO (CRD42020171591).

show abstract

“…Regarding PROM development, six studies described the development process and the methodological qualities of all these studies were rated as doubtful [ 30 , 31 , 35 , 38 , 41 , 44 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… + ? 0 0 – 0 0 CFQ-Japanese [ 36 ] + – 0 + 0 – 0 0 CFQ-Chinese [ 30 ] + + ? + 0 + 0 0 FIAQ [ 37 ] 0 0 0 ?…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Association of oral health with nutritional status of the older adults: a cross-sectional study

Gao,

Fu,

Wang

et al. 2024

Eur J Nutr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Chewing ability and its associated factors among community‐dwelling older adults in Chengdu, China: A cross‐sectional study

Ji,

Tang,

Liu

2024

Japan Journal Nursing Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimTo investigate the current status of chewing ability and analyze the risk factors among Chinese community‐dwelling older adults.MethodsIn this cross‐sectional study, color‐changeable gum and a color difference meter were used to assess chewing ability in the population. The statistical analysis employed multivariate logistic regression models to identify and quantify the factors influencing chewing ability.ResultsA total of 373 community‐dwelling adults aged 65 and older in Chengdu, in the west of China, were included in this study; 64 individuals (17.2%) exhibited signs of poor chewing ability. Female (odds ratio [OR]: 0.124, 95% CI: 0.057–0.268, p < .001), education level with college degree and above (OR: 0.114, 95% CI: 0.030–0.434, p = .001), number of teeth less than 20 (OR: 5.401, 95% CI: 2.509–11.626, p < .001), and decreased oral diadochokinesis (OR: 4.445, 95% CI: 1.775–11.132, p = .001) were significant factors in chewing ability in this study, after adjustment for potential variables.ConclusionsThe prevalence of decreased chewing ability among Chinese community‐dwelling older adults was 17.2% and decreased chewing ability was associated with men, lower education level, less than 20 teeth and decreased oral diadochokinesis.

show abstract

Development and validation of a chewing function questionnaire for Chinese older adults

Cited by 9 publications

References 23 publications

Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review

Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review

Association of oral health with nutritional status of the older adults: a cross-sectional study

Chewing ability and its associated factors among community‐dwelling older adults in Chengdu, China: A cross‐sectional study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About