1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(96)01285-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of an indirect enzyme immunoassay for detection of ovine antibody to Brucella ovis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…23 For the evaluation of repeatability, the CV values of 13.4% for the equivocal sera and 0.64% for the positive sera, are considered as acceptable and comparable to those reported by other authors of 5.98-11.8%. 3,4,17 Although SD values for reproducibility have not, to our knowledge, been reported, the value obtained for the cELISA can be considered satisfactory because the value is similar to the values obtained by other authors for repeatability.…”
Section: 22supporting
confidence: 81%
“…23 For the evaluation of repeatability, the CV values of 13.4% for the equivocal sera and 0.64% for the positive sera, are considered as acceptable and comparable to those reported by other authors of 5.98-11.8%. 3,4,17 Although SD values for reproducibility have not, to our knowledge, been reported, the value obtained for the cELISA can be considered satisfactory because the value is similar to the values obtained by other authors for repeatability.…”
Section: 22supporting
confidence: 81%
“…A confirmação do diagnósti-co pode ser feita pelo cultivo em meios seletivos para isolamento da bactéria a partir do sêmen de carneiros, descargas vaginais e leite das ovelhas (Bulgin 1990, Grilló et al 1999, Baigún et al 2000. No entanto, os métodos indiretos são amplamente utilizados, sendo a imunodifusão em gel de ágar (IDGA), a reação de fixação do complemento (RFC) e o ensaio imunoenzimático indireto (ELISA) os métodos sorológicos mais utilizados em vários países (Burgess & Norris 1982, Worthington et al 1984, Vigliocco et al 1997, Robles 1998 animais (IBGE 1998). Nas mesorregiões do Agreste e Mata Paraibana a pecuária é menos expressiva e a agricultura é bastante diversificada, predominando os pequenos estabelecimentos agropecuários.…”
Section: Introdução Introdução Introdução Introdução Introduçãounclassified
“…However, CFT has some drawbacks like complexity, incompatibility with anticomplementary and hemolyzed sera, prozone phenomena and occasional false reactions. On the other hand, AGID is a very labour intensive test and has low number of test capacity [2][3][4]6,18,19] . Of the serological methods used to detect antibodies to B. ovis, I-ELISA has been shown to be the most sensitive and specific test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, among chronically infected rams which show CFT negative results are not rare. On the other hand, AGID is a very labour intensive test and has low sample capacity [2][3][4][5][6] . Various I-ELISAs have been developed for detection of antibodies against B. ovis antigens with various results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%