Development and validation of the smart management strategy for health assessment tool-short form (SAT-SF) in cancer survivors

Yun, Young Ho; Jung, Ju Youn; Sim, Jin Ah; Lee, Jong Mog; Noh, Dong Young; Han, Wonshik; Park, Kyu Joo; Jeong, Seung Yong; Park, Ji Won; Wu, Hong Gyun; Chie, Eui Kyu; Kim, Hak Jae; Jung, Kyung Hae; Zo, Jae Ill; Kim, Sung Hoon; Lee, Jeong Eon; Nam, Seok Jin; Lee, Eun Sook; Oh, Jae Hwan; Kim, Young Woo; Kim, Young Tae; Shim, Young Mog

doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1723-1

Cited by 11 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The personal sets of the SAT were positively associated with better physical and mental QOL as measured using the SF-12. Our study indicates that these SAT-Life scores were able to differentiate well between the before-maintenance group versus the maintenance group for achieving goals, (Yun et al 2018b) and between group with high and low scores on depression in the general population. Our ndings may indicate the importance of focusing on coping strategies for prevention of depression.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 56%

“…(Diener et al 1985) To measure the impact of different aspects of health status on SAT-Life, we also assessed the respondents' ve health statuses from a holistic point of view (physical, mental, social, spiritual, and general health status). (Yun et al 2016) SAT-Life is based on the previously validated SAT-SF questionnaire for use among cancer patients to evaluate their self-management health strategies (Yun et al 2015;Yun et al 2017), and then modi ed to assess the general population's coping strategies to help them overcome life crises and improve their QOL and well-being. The SAT-Life assessment consisted of three strategy sets: 1) core strategies (SAT-C), 2) preparation strategies (SAT-P), and 3) implementation strategies (SAT-I).…”

Section: Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(Yun et al 2018b) The SAT-SF demonstrated good internal consistency and promising reliability compared to the original form. (Yun et al 2018b) Therefore, in this study, we aimed to modify the SAT-SF to assess coping strategies for overcoming life crises and improving QOL and well-being among the general population, validate the assessment tool with the general population, and rename it as the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool-Life version (SAT-Life).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Validity of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool-Life (SAT-Life) in General Population

Yun

Sim

2020

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to determine the reliability and validity of the life version of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool (SAT-Life) for the general South Korean population. We recruited 1,200 respondents using an equal-probability sampling method from March to May 2018. A life version of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool (SAT-Life) Cronbach’ α was used to determine the reliability of the 30-item SAT-Life. Comparisons with the Self-Reported Health Status (SRHS), Short Form-12 (SF-12), McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQOL), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) were conducted for establishing the discriminant and concurrent validity. Three sets of SAT-Life demonstrated a high reliability with good internal consistency (Cronbach’ α 0.86 for SAT-Core, 0.88 for SAT-Preparation, and 0.86 for SAT-Implementation). The total scores of the three SAT differentiated well between the before-maintenance group versus the maintenance group for achieving goals in the participants, and between the group with high depression score versus that with lower depression score in the general population. These SAT-Life scores were positively associated with health status and physical and mental quality of life (QOL). The scores of the SAT-Life were correlated with social support and spiritual well-being measured using the MQOL, and life satisfaction measured using SWLS. The 30-item SAT-Life had a satisfactory internal consistency and validity for the general South Korean population. Further validation should be carried out in a cohort study across different cultures, including an assessment of sensitivity.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 56%

Section: Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Validity of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool-Life (SAT-Life) in General Population

Yun

Sim

2020

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Like the original HEBPI, the new short-form tool assesses health behaviors that promote the establishment and maintenance of health habits, but does so in a simpler and more rapid manner. We applied a stepwise regression analysis method, previously used to reduce the SF-36 and SAT questionnaire, 30,39 to decrease the number of included items and, thus, to improve the usefulness of the HEBPI. Ultimately, we developed the HEBPI-SF, which comprises 53 items.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and validation of the Highly Effective Health Behavior Pattern Inventory – Short Form

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a short form (SF) of the highly effective health behavior pattern inventory (HEBPI) for chronic disease patients for comfort to use. Methods HEBPI-SF is a self-reported questionnaire based on highly effective health behaviors associated with building healthy habits. HEBPI-SF was validated by calculating adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for the 12 HEBPI-SF health behavior subscales and the maintenance of the 12 corresponding health habits. Results HEBPI-SF developed in this study comprised 12 subscales and 53 items, utilizing patient data (N = 724) derived from the original HEBPI (12 subscales and 131items). HEBPI-SF demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach’s α of 0.703–0.859) and showed that the 12 health behaviors included in the HEBPI are associated with the maintenance of the corresponding health habits (aOR: 2.29–8.42). The scores of the HEBPI-SF showed a positive correlation with physical, mental, social, spiritual and general health status, quality of life, and self-management strategies. Discussion HEBPI-SF is a reliable tool for the assessment of health behaviors of chronically ill patients. Considering previous findings of simple health behaviors significantly affecting health status, this survey tool for the assessment of health behaviors is useful for promotion and maintenance of healthy habits.

show abstract

“…Moreover, to reduce the assessment burden and elicit comprehensive information about the patient's strategies, we developed a 30-item short version of the SAT. 19 The SAT-Short Form (SAT-SF) demonstrated good internal consistency and promising reliability compared to the original form. 19 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Association of the Health Management Strategy with Subjective Health and Well-being Outcomes in General Population

Yun

Sim

2021

J Korean Med Sci

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background People face many obstacles to overcoming crisis in life and proactively manage life crises. This study aimed to evaluate the association of self-management strategy with subjective health and well-being for the general South Korean population. Methods We recruited 1,200 respondents using an equal-probability sampling method from March to May 2018. A questionnaire including life version of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool (SAT-Life), the five Health Status Questionnaire, Short Form-12, McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQOL), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) was administered to participants. Results In multiple stepwise logistic regression model adjusted with basic demographic variables (age, sex, region, education and monthly income level), core strategy was independently associated with physical, mental, social, spiritual, and general health status (adjusted odds ratios [aORs], 1.97–2.92). Preparation strategy was independently associated with physical, mental, spiritual, and general health status (aORs, 2.36–3.31). Implementation strategy was independently associated with physical, social, spiritual, and general health status (aORs, 2.22–2.42). Core strategy and implementation strategy were independently associated with higher Physical Component Score (aORs, 2.21–2.29) and higher Mental Component Score (aORs, 1.68–1.76). Core strategy and preparation strategy were independently associated with lower PHQ-9 (aORs, 2.63–3.74). Pearson's correlation coefficients between scores on SAT-Life and the other factors (MQOL social support, MQOL spiritual well-being, and SWLS) explain having significant correlations ranging from 0.41–0.43. Conclusion Self-management strategies of health might be encouraged to manage subjective health and well-being outcomes.

show abstract

Development and validation of the smart management strategy for health assessment tool-short form (SAT-SF) in cancer survivors

Abstract: The 30-item SAT-SF had a satisfactory internal consistency and validity for cancer patients with minimal loss of information compared with the original SAT.

Cited by 11 publications

References 21 publications

The Validity of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool-Life (SAT-Life) in General Population

The Validity of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool-Life (SAT-Life) in General Population

Development and validation of the Highly Effective Health Behavior Pattern Inventory – Short Form

The Association of the Health Management Strategy with Subjective Health and Well-being Outcomes in General Population

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About