Development and Validation of the Arab Youth Mental Health Scale

Abstract

A variety of measures of mental health have been used with youth. The reason for choosing one scale over another in any given situation is rarely stated, and cross-cultural validation is scarce. Psychometric testing is crucial before utilizing any measure of mental health with a certain population, due to possible cultural variations in interpreting meaning. The research reported herein describes the development and psychometric testing of the Arab Youth Mental Health Scale. The process included 5 phases: (1) reviewing existing scales leading to the identification of 14 non-clinical and relatively short mental health scales used previously with youth; (2) rating the scales by the researchers and community members leading to the identification of 3 scales with apt structure, and that were judged to be suitable, applicable, and appropriate; (3) soliciting youth input to assess comprehension of each item in the selected 3 scales and to discover context specific mental health related feelings, thoughts, and expressions; (4) seeking expert opinion to classify items remaining after phase 3 that measured common mental disorders, and to limit repetitiveness; and (5) testing for psychometric properties of the 28 items that remained after the previous 4 phases. The contribution of each phase to the process is described separately. Results of the exploratory principal component analysis resulted in one factor which explained 28% of the variance and for which 21 items loaded above an eigenvalue of 0.5. No other factor added significantly to the explanation of variance, nor had items that added theoretical or conceptual constructs. The process of soliciting feedback from youth groups, the community and professionals; and of field testing was challenging; but resulted in a contextually sensitive, culturally appropriate and reliable scale to measure mental health of youth. We recommend that researchers measuring mental health of youth critically analyze the relevance of existing scales to their context; consider using the AYMH scale if appropriate to their target population; and when needed, use a similar methodology to construct a relevant, culturally and contextually sensitive measure.

Psychometric Properties of an Instrument to Measure Facilitators and Barriers to Nurses’ Participation in Continuing Education Programs

“…Content validity of INMCEI was established by assistance of academic members’ expert for evaluating the instrument and in order to obtain the most appropriate item content. This method is one of the best ways to develop an evidence based questionnaire with appropriate content ( Rubio et al, 2003 ; Makhoul et al, 2011) .…”

Resilience in Context: A Brief and Culturally Grounded Measure for Syrian Refugee and Jordanian Host‐Community Adolescents

“…We used regionally and internationally validated screening instruments. To assess mental health difficulties, we implemented the 21‐item Arab Youth Mental Health (AYMH) questionnaire (Mahfoud et al., ; Makhoul et al., ). We also used the Arabic version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), a brief screening tool for psychiatric difficulties (Alyahri & Goodman, ).…”

Validation of the Arab Youth Mental Health scale as a screening tool for depression/anxiety in Lebanese children

“…The process of developing the scale for use in a community-based participatory intervention study has been described in detail in a recently published article [22]. In brief, the process of constructing the scale began with translating and reviewing a total of 14 English-language mental health measurement instruments that focus on CMDs and that have been previously used with youth.…”