Development of a biorefinery optimized biofuel supply curve for the Western United States

Parker, Nathan; Tittmann, Peter; Hart, Quinn; Nelson, Richard; Skog, Ken; Schmidt, Anneliese; Gray, Edward; Jenkins, Bryan M.

doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.06.007

Cited by 127 publications

(76 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Across models reviewed here (except WWS), between 4 and 13 billion gallons of gasoline equivalent (BGGE) (0.4-1.7 exajoules) are used in 2050 -up from about 1.0 BGGE today. 14 Models utilize biomass supply curves from Parker et al (2010) or De la Torre Ugarte and Ray (2000).…”

Section: Contribution From Bioenergymentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of low-carbon pathways for California

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Jurisdictions throughout the world are contemplating greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation strategies that will enable meeting long-term GHG targets. Many jurisdictions are now focusing on the 2020-2050 timeframe. We conduct an inter-model comparison of nine California statewide energy models with GHG mitigation scenarios to 2050 to better understand common insights across models, ranges of intermediate GHG targets (i.e., for 2030), necessary technology deployment rates, and future modeling needs for the state. The models (not including the Wind-Water-Solar model) ; the transportation sector is decarbonized using a mix of energy efficiency gains and alternative-fueled vehicles; and bioenergy is directed almost exclusively towards the transportation sector, accounting for a maximum of 40 % of transportation energy by 2050. Models suggest that without new policies, emissions from nonenergy sectors and from high-global-warming-potential gases may alone exceed California's 2050 GHG goal. Finally, future modeling efforts should focus on the: economic impacts and logistical feasibility of given scenarios, interactive effects between two or more climate policies, role of uncertainty in the state's long-term energy planning, and identification of pathways that achieve the dual goals of criteria pollutant and GHG emission reduction.

show abstract

Section: Contribution From Bioenergymentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of low-carbon pathways for California

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The majority of the optimal location studies focus on bioenergy production, including fuels, heat, and power (e.g., Leduc et al 2008;Velazquez-Marti and Fernandez-Gonzalez 2010;Parker et al 2010;Tittmann et al 2010;Bai et al 2011;Kim et al 2011;Natarajan et al 2012Natarajan et al , 2014Palander and Voutilainen 2013;Marvin et al 2013;Pantaleo et al 2014). However, some publications addressed BSC optimization for chemicals and materials production, including location problems, for example, Zhang and Wright (2014), Santibañez-Aguilar et al (2015), Kokossis et al (2015), , Sukumara et al (2014), Dansereau et al (2014) (Table 3).…”

Section: Supply Chain Optimizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Forest biomass supply chain optimization for a biorefinery aiming to produce high-value bio-based materials and chemicals from lignin and forestry residues: a review of literature

Dessbesell

Pulkki

et al. 2017

Can. J. For. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technological development has enabled the production of new value-added products from lignocellulosic residues such as lignin. This has allowed the forest industry to diversify its product portfolio and maximize the economic returns from feedstock, while simultaneously working towards sustainable alternatives to petroleum-based products. Although previous research has explored industrial-scale production opportunities, many challenges persist, including the cost of woody biomass and its supply chain reliability. While numerous studies have addressed these issues, their emphasis has traditionally been on bioenergy, with little focus on biochemical, biomaterials, and bioproducts. This review seeks to address this gap through a systematic study of the work recently reported by researchers. A lot of work has been published from United States and Canada with an emphasis on bioenergy production (84.8%), 4.6% of the work is focused on biomass to materials and chemicals, and 10.6% addressed both. Between 2012 and 2015, the majority of published research focused on biomass to materials and chemicals and both biomass to energy and biomass to materials and chemicals. This fact highlights recent interests in diversified biorefinery portfolios. However, further work concerning forest biomass supply chain optimization and new high-value bio-based materials and chemicals is necessary.Key words: biomass to energy, biomass to materials and chemicals, economic optimization, lignocellulosic residues, value-added bio-based products.Résumé : Des avancées technologiques ont rendu possible la production de nouveaux produits à valeur ajoutée à partir de résidus lignocellulosiques tels que la lignine. Cela a permis à l'industrie forestière de diversifié sa gamme de produits et de maximiser les retombées économiques de la matière première tout en travaillant simultanément à développer des alternatives durables aux produits à base de pétrole. Bien que les travaux de recherche précédents aient exploré les opportunités de production à l'échelle industrielle, plusieurs défis persistent, incluant le coût de la biomasse ligneuse et la fiabilité de sa chaîne logistique. Alors que de nombreuses études se sont intéressées à ces questions, l'accent a traditionnellement été mis sur la bioénergie et très peu sur les bioproduits : produits biochimiques et biomatériaux. Cette revue de littérature vise à combler cette lacune par le biais d'une étude systématique des travaux récemment publiés par les chercheurs. Beaucoup de travaux publiés aux États-Unis et au Canada mettent l'accent sur la production de bioénergie (84,8 %), 4,6 % des travaux portent sur la transformation de la biomasse en matériaux et produits chimiques et 10,6 % s'intéressent aux deux sujets. La majorité des travaux de recherche publiés entre 2012 et 2015 portent sur la transformation de la biomasse en matériaux et produits chimiques et sur les deux sujets, soit la transformation de la biomasse en énergie, matériaux et produits chimiques. Cela met en évidence l'intérêt récen...

show abstract

“…The purpose of Lambert and Middleton (2010)'s article is to assess the effectiveness of field-to-refinery and finding the optimal biomass harvest, storage, transportation, pretreatment, and refining activities. Parker et al (2010) represented a bio-refinery sitting and resource assessment optimization model. They used a MILP model and different types of biomass to maximize profits in the biomass supply chain until bringing it to fuel terminals.…”

Section: Lp Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%