2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.joon.2006.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a constipation risk assessment scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
24
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, using the Constipation Risk Assessment Scale, a score of 2 for girls indicated that being female was a risk factor for functional constipation. 9 Also in contrast to our results, a US study found that girls had 3 times higher risk of functional constipation than boys. 10 However, another US study concluded that gender was not a risk factor for functional constipation in children.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, using the Constipation Risk Assessment Scale, a score of 2 for girls indicated that being female was a risk factor for functional constipation. 9 Also in contrast to our results, a US study found that girls had 3 times higher risk of functional constipation than boys. 10 However, another US study concluded that gender was not a risk factor for functional constipation in children.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The rigour of the validation process can be greatly influenced by how experts are chosen and utilized for instrument development (Gibson et al 2006). Increasingly, content validity is being undertaken more systematically in the initial phase of instrument development (Gibson et al 2006;Richmond and Wright 2005;Woolery et al 2006). The importance of content validity during the entire process of instrument development cannot be underestimated, as an instrument can be reliable without being valid, but unreliable instrument cannot be valid (DeVellis 1991).…”
Section: Content Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…kons ti pas yon için risk fak tör leri ara sın da dır. 3,4,13 So nuç ola rak kons ti pas yon, bi re yin ya şam kali te si ni dü şür me si, tü ken miş li ğe ve iş gü cü kay bı na ne den ol ma sı, sağ lık ba kım ma li ye ti ni art tır ma sı, sağ lık dü ze yi üze rin de ki olum suz et ki le ri ne de niyle bi rey için ma jör bir sağ lık so ru nu ha li ne ge le bilmek te dir. [13][14][15] Kons ti pas yo nu ta nı la ma ve cid diye ti nin dü ze yi ni be lir le me, so ru nun çö zü mün de anah tar rol oy na mak ta dır.…”
unclassified
“…1 Kons ti pas yon ge nel po pü las yo nu %2-28 oranın da et ki le yen bir sağ lık so ru nu dur. [2][3][4][5] Ül ke miz de po pü las yo na da ya lı ya pı lan ça lış ma so nuç la rı na gö -re kons ti pas yon gö rül me ora nı %22-40 ara sın da değiş mek te dir. 6 Kons ti pas yon; dış kı la ma da zor luk, ara lık lı, tam ol ma yan de fe kas yon ve ay rı ca ye ter siz ve ya ağ rı ve ren de fe kas yon iş le mi ola rak ta nım lan mak ta dır.…”
unclassified