2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a flashback correlation for burner-stabilized hydrogen-air premixed flames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study quantified the concept of a safety allowance to preserve the performance of the domestic burner. Even though there are experimental and numerical studies to understand and solve the flashback phenomenon [88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98], these studies are focused on large-scale and high-pressure burners, which highlights the need for studies on domestic burners. For instance, Vance, Goey, and Oijen [98] numerically studied the flashback limits of slit burners.…”
Section: Direct Hydrogen Combustion Cookermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study quantified the concept of a safety allowance to preserve the performance of the domestic burner. Even though there are experimental and numerical studies to understand and solve the flashback phenomenon [88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98], these studies are focused on large-scale and high-pressure burners, which highlights the need for studies on domestic burners. For instance, Vance, Goey, and Oijen [98] numerically studied the flashback limits of slit burners.…”
Section: Direct Hydrogen Combustion Cookermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though there are experimental and numerical studies to understand and solve the flashback phenomenon [88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98], these studies are focused on large-scale and high-pressure burners, which highlights the need for studies on domestic burners. For instance, Vance, Goey, and Oijen [98] numerically studied the flashback limits of slit burners. They established that the traditional flashback association with the critical velocity gradient does not disintegrate the flashback data because it does not consider the stretch-induced superior diffusion effects.…”
Section: Direct Hydrogen Combustion Cookermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this theory does not take into account additional phenomena that alter flame stabilization, such as flame stretch [29,30], preferential diffusion [31,32] and coupled heat exchange with the walls [33,34,35,36]. Preferential diffusion is especially relevant in the case of low Lewis number fuels such as H 2 [37,38,39], as recently shown by numerical flow simulations attempting to extend the critical velocity gradient theory for hydrogen flames stabilized on perforated plates [40]. One of the main outcomes is the importance of the Markstein length of these flames, found to be negative for lean hydrogen-air mixtures [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main outcomes is the importance of the Markstein length of these flames, found to be negative for lean hydrogen-air mixtures [41]. Its impact on flame stabilization had to be taken into account to correctly predict flashback limits of flames stabilized on a flame-holder [42,43,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where v is the local gas velocity, n is the flame normal vector computed for a scalar field of the reaction progress variable Y , S D,Y is the density weighted local flame displacement speed at a location corresponding to a Y iso-level and V f is the absolute speed of the flame front relative to the laboratory frame. In order to illustrate the unique stabilization behaviour of the hydrogen flame in contrast to methane flames, a typical hydrogen and a methane flame stabilized on a multi-slit burner are shown in Fig 1 . The geometrical setup is based on the recent study by Vance et al [8] with slit width W " 2 mm, distance between plates D " 1 mm and plate thickness t " 1 mm at ϕ " 0.7 for both flames. The burner temperature is kept constant at 700 K for both H 2 and CH 4 flames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%